Search for: "Oxley v. Oxley" Results 921 - 940 of 1,120
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Oct 2015, 6:32 am by Doug Cornelius
For instance, Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) mandates that a company have a hotline. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 7:39 am by Michelle Capezza
  Within a year of an IPO, the EGC would report three years’ worth of financial statements; (iv)              Provides exceptions to rules on mandatory audit firm rotation; (v)                Exempts EGCs from certain requirements under Dodd-Frank legislation such as the say on pay requirements and disclosure of median compensation ratios of… [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 6:05 am
Bachelder III, McCarter & English LLP, on Thursday, October 13, 2016 Tags: Accounting, Banks, Bonuses, Clawbacks, Disclosure, Dodd-Frank Act, Equity-based compensation, Executive Compensation, Financial institutions, Incentives, Management, Misconduct, Pay for performance, Risk management,Sarbanes–Oxley Act [read post]
8 May 2014, 6:23 am by Joy Waltemath
Dodd-Frank also amended a part of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and created a cause of action for violations of the substantive whistleblower provision. [read post]
7 Apr 2012, 9:59 am by William Carleton
Any firm that goes public already has up to two years after its IPO to comply with certain Sarbanes-Oxley auditing requirements. [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 6:08 am
Thomas (Vanderbilt University), on Friday, March 9, 2018 Tags: Board independence, Boards of Directors, Delaware articles, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Disclosure, Fiduciary duties, Hedge funds, In re Revlon, In re Trulia, Management, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions, Settlements, Shareholder activism, Shareholder suits, Shareholder voting, Unocal v. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 11:00 am by Race to the Bottom
 Federal regulations pertaining to clawback provisions were first introduced under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“SOX”). [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 6:49 am by Roger Parloff
  The paragraph containing the specific statutory language in question, paragraph (c), was added to an already existing §1512 as part of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 3:44 pm by Dave
Imputation involves concluding what the parties would have intended, whereas inference involves concluding what they did intend. ([126])And so, Jones v Kernott [2011] UKHL 53. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
O’Hagan, 521 U.S. 642 (1997). [6] See, e.g., Sarbanes-Oxley Act § 807; S.E.C. v. [read post]