Search for: "P. v. Hard"
Results 921 - 940
of 2,629
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Oct 2011, 2:27 pm
City of Thornton, 44 P.3d 1044 (Colo.2002). [read post]
7 Sep 2019, 4:08 am
Cole v. [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 5:00 am
And these are the same legislators who have been working hard to curtail voting rights and [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 11:23 am
., LLC v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 9:12 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 3:23 pm
In a dramatically divided but decisively 6-3 decision in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 3:23 pm
§ 109(a), must mean “lawfully made in the United States”); see generally P. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 12:33 am
Hard to say. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 8:19 pm
DeLuca v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 12:39 pm
In October, President Obama signed HR 2892, The Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act of 2010, which contains a provision barring the transfer of Guantanamo detainees onto US soil except to stand trial (see Title V, Sec. 552). [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 9:55 pm
After losing on fair use in Righthaven v. [read post]
26 Sep 2012, 8:51 am
Here’s a quick chronology, as set forth in the relevant court opinion, Stewart v. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm
The respondent's skeleton argument cites in support of that proposition R v Gloucestershire County Council ex p Barry [1997] AC 584, esp at 604E-F and 605 (Lord Nicholls), R v East Sussex County Council ex p Tandy [1997] AC 714, esp at 747B (Lord Browne-Wilkinson), and Ali v Birmingham CC [2010] UKSC 8; [2010] 2 AC 39, at [4] -[6] (Lord Hope). [57] And finally, Bury v Gibbons was a case in which the Authority had simply ignored a request for… [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm
The respondent's skeleton argument cites in support of that proposition R v Gloucestershire County Council ex p Barry [1997] AC 584, esp at 604E-F and 605 (Lord Nicholls), R v East Sussex County Council ex p Tandy [1997] AC 714, esp at 747B (Lord Browne-Wilkinson), and Ali v Birmingham CC [2010] UKSC 8; [2010] 2 AC 39, at [4] -[6] (Lord Hope). [57] And finally, Bury v Gibbons was a case in which the Authority had simply ignored a request for… [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 3:54 am
Of course, reaching consensus is hard. [read post]
8 May 2018, 6:37 am
KIT KAT is back as the Advocate General gives his two fingerstwo centsNestlé v Mondelez v EUIPO Joined Cases C‑84/17 P, C‑85/17 P and C‑95/17 P (April 2018)In Volume II we reported on Nestlé’s loss of its UK shape mark for the four finger Kit Kat chocolate bar. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 1:27 pm
Special guest and former financial advisor, James P. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 9:59 am
” (Mamou v. [read post]
