Search for: "People v Lord"
Results 921 - 940
of 1,806
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2016, 1:50 am
Case Law: ETK v News Group Newspapers “Privacy Injunctions and Children” – Edward Craven Case Law: OPO v MLA, Shock and disbelief at the Court of Appeal – Dan Tench The Perils of “Revenge Porn” – Alex Cochrane News: Tulisa “Sex Tape”, false privacy turns into true privacy How to avoid defamation – Steven Price La Regina Nuda and Italian Privacy Law – Athalie Matthews and Giacomo Parmigiani Case Law:… [read post]
23 May 2023, 12:58 am
The draft Public Order Act 1986 (Serious Disruption to Life in the Community Regulations 2023, if they come into effect, will allow police in England and Wales to impose restrictions on protests and processions that cause “more than minor” hindrance to day-to-day activities for other people. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 8:21 am
Insofar as Mostyn J had previously determined otherwise in cases such as DL v SL [2015] EWHC 2621 (Fam); [2016] 1 WLR 1259 and Appleton v Gallagher, he was wrong: Gallagher at [33]-[34]. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 8:35 am
Lord knows how they find the time…to potentially fall under this definition. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 3:13 pm
Chandler v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 3:17 am
At an event marking the first anniversary of the “Libel Reform Campaign”, Justice minister Lord McNally said that English libel law is “not fit for purpose”. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 4:40 pm
Different people respond to reading, hearing or viewing the same content in different ways. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 4:30 am
To Justice Thomas, the intentions of people who in good faith wanted more racial diversity on campuses in 2013 are no different from the intentions of people who wanted all-white campuses in 1954. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 7:35 am
” A Lord Chamberlain for the internet? [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 4:09 pm
This overrides the orthodox position at common law (as re-affirmed by the House of Lords in Berezovsky v Michaels [2000] 1 WLR 1004), to the effect that each actionable publication of a defamatory statement constitutes a separate tort which must be considered separately when deciding if the English court has jurisdiction to hear a claim about it. [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 6:33 pm
Hillman v. [read post]
28 May 2009, 11:52 pm
Yes, criminal defendants are going to lose some too -- like Michigan v. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 2:26 am
Homer v West Yorkshire Police is about indirect age discrimination. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 12:30 am
In the 1765 case of Entick v Carrington the Lord Chief Justice declared that the law “should be clear in proportion as the power is exorbitant. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 1:06 am
Eady to go The Lord Chief Justice has announced the appointment of Mr Justice Tugendhat as Judge in charge of the Jury and Non-Jury Lists with effect from 1 October 2010. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 2:38 pm
The Secretary of State for the Home Department v R (on the application of) Joint Council for The Welfare of Immigrants (2020) EWCA Civ 542 The Court of Appeal have their way with the judicial review of the ‘Right to Rent’ scheme. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 4:00 am
The decision by Justice O’Donnell in R. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 7:14 am
This law gave effect to European Directives and Regulations going back as far as 1997, and had been brought to the insurers’ attention then, and again in 2002 (Sarwar v Alam). [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 7:14 am
This law gave effect to European Directives and Regulations going back as far as 1997, and had been brought to the insurers’ attention then, and again in 2002 (Sarwar v Alam). [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 12:54 pm
The court’s decision in City Walk – Urban Mission Inc. v. [read post]
