Search for: "People v. Mike" Results 921 - 940 of 1,506
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Apr 2012, 4:37 am
Citing the 1803 landmark case of Marbury v. [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 10:18 am by Randy Barnett
The legitimacy of judicial review was settled more than 200 years ago in the landmark case Marbury v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 1:00 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Earlier today, I had the pleasure of visiting Professor Jack Goldsmith’s “Foreign Relations Law” class, which is studying Hamdan v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 6:15 am by Mandelman
  By the way, it might interest you to know that Mike Milken’s son, Lance Milken, still works at Apollo. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 8:25 am
By Mike Dorf Updated with CNN link. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 9:30 pm
 But evaluated through the political frame of Bush v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 6:51 am by Kiran Bhat
Bonnie Goldstein of the Washington Post’s She The People blog looks at Tuesday’s arguments in Miller v. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 2:37 pm by Rick
Of course, you could just be a big fat blowhard people want to silence. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 7:57 am by Rob Robinson
High Court to Weigh Warrantless Use of GPS in Non-Criminal Cases - bit.ly/wZTp7P (Theresa Marangas, Benjamin Neidl) Open Records and FOIA – Pushing Government Technology into the 21st Century - bit.ly/xv2Ulg (Heidi Maher) Patel v Unite – Order For Investigation of Deleted Internet Forum - bit.ly/xsuqj7 (Chris Dale) Perspective on Legal Search and Document Review – bit.ly/wfbqR0 (Ralph Losey) Policy vs. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 6:22 pm
By Mike Dorf In a recent essay in the New Yorker, Dahlia Lithwick reviews a new book by Dale Carpenter that tells the story behind Lawrence v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 5:50 am by INFORRM
PCC staff are available at all times to advise members of the public further, and to offer practical, immediate assistance.” Since last week’s round up there are a number of “resolved” PCC complaints to report: Mr Julian Assange v The Observer The Observer, clause 1, 09/03/2012; Mrs Christine Hemming v Sunday Mercury, clause 1, 08/03/2012; Mrs Carol Mlatem v South Wales Argus, clause 3, 08/03/2012; Ms Pamela Fenton v Sunday Mail, clause 1,… [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 4:27 am
Now one needs to say more about prejudice, of course, but I think the basic idea is captured in what is wrong with Justice Scalia's dissenting view in Romer v. [read post]