Search for: "People v. Tooks" Results 921 - 940 of 12,208
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2023, 9:31 am by Dave Maass
Southern Command redacted scans of artwork created by people detained at Guantanamo Bay. [read post]
11 Mar 2023, 4:24 am by centerforartlaw
Q: On April 21, 2022, the Supreme Court in Cassirer v. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
Bruen is quite simply a national nightmare.In United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 2:01 pm by Kevin LaCroix
In December 2018, the directors learned that the company’s Global Chief People Officer, David Fairhurst, had allegedly engaged in an act of sexual harassment, the investigation of which uncovered that in 2016 the same individual had engaged in a prior incident of sexual harassment. [read post]
4 Mar 2023, 4:38 am by SHG
It is extremely difficult to square the state bar’s version with what the prosecutor said, as recounted in Miller v Pate. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 7:52 am by Eugene Volokh
An interesting decision Wednesday by N.Y. trial court judge Thomas Marcelle (Albany County), Hines v. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal Indian Americans Rapidly Climbing Political Ranks DNyuz – Maggie Astor and Jill Cowan (New York Times) | Published: 2/27/2023 Despite being one of the largest immigrant groups in the U.S., Americans of Indian descent in 20123 were barely represented in politics. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 7:20 am by John Elwood
Also, of the two cases presenting the safety-valve issue, the court took the one the government recommended rather than the petition that claimed it was a better vehicle. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 4:40 am by Michael C. Dorf
The gravedigger explains that such vaccines will prevent hundreds of thousands or even millions of deaths, including a great many in his city, thus depriving him of the earnings he would otherwise receive from digging graves for all the people who would have died of COVID if not for the vaccines. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 11:55 am by admin
Mann, against National Review magazine, the Competitive Enterprise Institute, and Mark Steyn.[1] Back in 2014, I commented upon the oddity of a scientist’s claim of defamation against lay people for criticizing a scientist’s work.[2] Mann took umbrage to statements, critical of his work that generated a “hockey-stick” model of global temperature rises. [read post]