Search for: "Petite v. United States"
Results 921 - 940
of 13,617
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2014, 9:58 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 2:50 pm
In Whorton v. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 6:02 pm
United States 15-8544Issue: (1) Whether Johnson v. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 4:26 am
The long-running saga of Bayer v. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 7:00 am
The petitions of the week are below the jump: Johnson v. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 8:04 pm
Ford: Two of the Three Issues Raised in the Petition are Not Dependent on the United States Supreme Court's Opinion in Williams III California Supreme Court Grants Review in Buell-Wilson v. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 6:05 am
United States, 530 U. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 11:20 am
Gore (1996) and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 1:49 pm
United States, No. 07-318; Chapman v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 11:57 am
Cardegna).Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (Okla.)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionReply of petitioner Nix v. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 9:15 am
On December 4, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) designated three Patent Trial and Appeals Board (PTAB) decisions as precedential. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 4:26 pm
United StatesDocket: 10-918Issue(s): (1) Whether a prior state disposition resulting in a one-year suspended sentence, which is not appealable or considered a "conviction" under state law, is a "prior conviction" that has "become final" for purposes of the penalty enhancement provision of 21 U.S.C. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 8:05 am
United States 17-5165 Issue: Whether Richardson v. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 12:01 am
”
In Korematsu v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 10:00 am
Here are the materials: CA9 Order Denying En Banc Petition + Opinions US En Banc Petition NCAI Amicus Brief Bryant Response Panel materials and commentary are here. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 4:00 pm
United States 17-7793 Issue: Whether 18 U.S.C. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 3:28 am
Here is the petition in Scudero v. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 9:40 am
Section 271(e)(1) states that it “shall not be an act of infringement to make, use, offer to sell, or sell within the United States or import into the United States a patented invention … solely for uses reasonably related to the development and submission of information under a Federal law which regulates the manufacture, use, or sale of drugs or veterinary biological products. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 8:40 am
Supreme Court affirmed dismissal of the habeas petition, holding that neither an International Court of Justice case, nor a memorandum issued by the President of the United States constitutes directly enforceable federal law that preempts state limitations on the filing of successive habeas petitions. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 6:40 pm
The case is American Tradition Partnership, et al., v. [read post]
