Search for: "Phillips v. Phillips"
Results 921 - 940
of 4,220
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Nov 2014, 6:00 am
” —Touche Ross & Co. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 4:00 am
” * In contrast, in Christopher v Phillips, 160 A.D.2d 1165, motion to appeal denied, 76 N.Y.2d 706, the court ruled that “if a hearing is not required by law, the substantial evidence standard of review does not apply [and] the appropriate standard for the purpose of judicial review [in such a situation] is whether the determination is arbitrary or capricious. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 10:14 am
Victoria Phillips, American University Washington College of Law4:15pm - Second Panel - Legal DiscussionJohn Connell, Archer Law (Counsel for Respondent)Joel MacMull, Archer Law (Counsel for Respondent)Jesse Witten, Drinker Biddle (representing Amanda Blackhorse, et al. amicus brief)Prof. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 3:54 pm
They are in the Phillips and Jordan case and the Yates Construction Company cases brought against the Bostics. [read post]
20 May 2016, 10:31 am
**There was an issue of PTAB's use of BRI, which did NOTeffect the outcome:Claims of an expired patent are giventheir ordinary and customary meaning in accordance withour opinion in Phillips v. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 9:30 pm
Arizona and New York Times v. [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 12:00 am
Here is the abstract: Moore v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 10:08 am
The foundation filed cert-stage and merits-stage amicus briefs in support of the government in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 7:57 am
Yet the Delaware Supreme Court’s decision in Marchand v. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 3:00 am
In Phillips v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 4:30 am
Phillips v. [read post]
5 May 2011, 1:47 am
As the sub-heading of Gill Phillips’ Guardian piece puts it a “Two tier system is being created as rich male stars take advantage of privacy protection“. [read post]
29 Dec 2006, 12:58 pm
Yes, Phillips v. [read post]
12 Feb 2011, 5:31 am
In its opinion in Luce v. [read post]
15 May 2016, 7:41 pm
LEXIS 60454 (D Z, May 5, 2016), an Arizona federal district court permitted a Muslim inmate to proceed with his complaint that he was not permitted to grow his beard longer than one-quarter inch, and that the feeding time for Ramadan began too late.In Phillips v. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 5:26 am
Phillip L. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
But in Phillips v. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 4:28 pm
Plata, featuring Phillips v. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 3:08 pm
Phillips’ religious beliefs. [read post]
