Search for: "Price v. United States" Results 921 - 940 of 5,286
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2016, 6:24 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
(“Watson”) appeals the final judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Delaware holding that claim 4 of U.S. [read post]
29 Jul 2012, 10:27 pm by Leland E. Beck
  The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit upheld an airline-advertising rule, remanded part of a health care exclusion decision, and declined to stay a political advertisement disclosure rule. [read post]
29 Jul 2012, 10:27 pm by Leland E. Beck
  The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit upheld an airline-advertising rule, remanded part of a health care exclusion decision, and declined to stay a political advertisement disclosure rule. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 12:00 am by Bryan West
The change order in question is a monument to ambiguity, only stating a unit price deduction and the description “work performed by others”. [read post]
As one of many examples, after the Titanic sank, the United States enacted a law that required any American ship carrying over 100 tons of weight to have enough lifeboats for every passenger. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 9:29 am by Steven Cohen
Facts: This case (United States of America for the use of Donald B. [read post]
18 Sep 2021, 6:39 am by INFORRM
United States defamation law has made it famously difficult for claimants to win their cases. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 1:37 pm by Venkat Balasubramani
Johnson County CC Sending Politically Charged Emails Does Not Support Disturbing the Peace Conviction — State v. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 10:02 am by Dylan Ballard
  But the fact that certain activities might have taken place in the United States is irrelevant if the economic consequences are not felt in the United States economy. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 8:17 pm
Arizona Cartridge Remanufacturers Association Inc. v Lexmark International Inc, 421 F.3d 981 (9th Cir. 2005) United States v. [read post]