Search for: "STATE v. CARTER"
Results 921 - 940
of 1,957
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2015, 7:15 am
Although the record did not set forth whether he “maintained employment records,” the other factors outlined in the Second Circuit’s decision in Carter v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 3:26 am
In 1994, Professor Kleinberger and co-author Carter G. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 3:19 pm
See Carter v. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 6:49 am
[United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 4:31 pm
Carter v. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 7:14 am
It is said that the law cannot keep pace with society, evolving about twenty years slower than the culture, but even the United States Supreme Court has caught on to the uniqueness of the modern “cell phone,” calling the devices “minicomputers that also happen to have the capacity to be used as a telephone” in a landmark case last year called Riley v. [read post]
14 Feb 2015, 12:19 pm
Carter–Wallace, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 2:43 pm
Carter. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 7:14 am
Moreover, under the indirect method, the professor failed to make out a prima facie case because he could not show the position was given to someone who was not better qualified than he (Carter v. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 4:00 am
Carter v. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 3:42 am
Killion v. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 11:25 am
Rowland Perkins, II, Martin Bert Carter, Mark Crosby Nevdahl, and Ryan Allan RauchCase Number: 11-cv-01962 (United States District Court for the Central District of California)Case Filed: December 21, 2011Qualifying Judgment/Order: December 10, 2014 1/27/2015 4/27/2015 2015-3 SEC vs. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 10:43 am
Carter, 122 N.C. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 12:59 pm
The litigants in United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 12:14 pm
See U.S. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 6:44 am
A federal district court in California gave preliminary approval to a $1 million settlement resolving claims on behalf of a class of 1,100 former PetSmart employees in the state (Pace v. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 10:30 pm
Friday afternoon, the Supreme Court announced that it would hear Glossip v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 11:15 am
And bad news for gun-toting jaywalkers as the Court denied cert. in Carter v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 8:10 am
Formerly the executive director of the National Congress of American Indians, she served as Legislative Liaison for the Native American Rights Fund and in the Carter Administration, and was lead plaintiff in Harjo et al v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 3:47 pm
Today in Christeson v. [read post]