Search for: "Sales v. State" Results 921 - 940 of 19,293
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2006, 9:25 am
The 10th Circuit recently issued an opinion in an interesting case involving issues of (1) unauthorized sales of genuine products and (2) use of the trademark holder's mark on the Internet in various ways.In Australian Gold, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2012, 7:36 am by My name
An example of a recent case in which a Texas federal judge dealt a blow to a developer by allowing a group of salespersons to proceed together as a class is Edwards v. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 8:38 am by Kevin Kaufman
Forty-five states impose statewide sales taxes, and in the wake of the Supreme Court’s 2018 South Dakota v. [read post]
25 May 2009, 5:18 pm
Another interesting objection to the Chrysler sale motion comes from the State of Connecticut. [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 4:15 am by James Nurton
The judgment in Case C172/18 AMS Neve Ltd, Barnett Waddingham Trustees, Mark Crabtree v Heritage Audio SL, Pedro Rodríguez Arribas addresses questions concerning jurisdiction, in particular in cases involving Internet sales. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 6:59 am by randal shaheen
”  Judge Sammartino emphasized the inherent conflict, stating that “Amylin certainly has an interest in controlling the release and use of confidential information to a sales force promoting what it views as a competitive product. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 8:55 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
But before closing off we make two points:In First Options of Chicago v. [read post]
24 Jul 2007, 6:00 am
In the mainstream press, the San Francisco Chronicle reports that "State Supreme Court nixes sales of shoes made with kangaroo hide" and the Los Angeles Times reports that "Adidas' use of kangaroo hide is illegal, state justices say. [read post]