Search for: "Shields v. United States"
Results 921 - 940
of 2,440
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2024, 1:51 pm
The Colorado state trial court held that the President is not an "Officer of the United States. [read post]
29 May 2020, 7:52 am
It is the policy of the United States that such a provider should properly lose the limited liability shield of subparagraph (c)(2)(A) and be exposed to liability like any traditional editor and publisher that is not an online provider. [read post]
29 May 2020, 7:52 am
It is the policy of the United States that such a provider should properly lose the limited liability shield of subparagraph (c)(2)(A) and be exposed to liability like any traditional editor and publisher that is not an online provider. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 3:52 am
He served as President of the National Association of State and Provincial Lotteries, an association of public gaming executives in the United States and Canada, and had been featured on the cover of Public Gaming International, a trade magazine.Problems began in 1988, when the state awarded a contract to install a statewide computer system for the sale of lottery tickets to General Instrument Corporation (GIC). [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 5:30 pm
The key law relied upon in the case, the Alien Tort Statute, requires, after a 2013 Supreme Court decision called Kiobel v Royal Dutch Petroleum, that plaintiffs show that the matter “touch and concern” the United States in order for the case to proceed here. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 11:55 am
Ct. 2183, 2192 (2020); United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 4:00 am
In addition, in Filarsky v. [read post]
11 Jun 2011, 6:27 pm
United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 1:04 pm
In Westfall v. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 5:15 pm
I guess I’ve been lucky because I have never had to do a trial where the opposing party acted in person, “pro se”, as they call it in the United States. [read post]
7 Apr 2019, 9:44 pm
I guess I’ve been lucky because I have never had to do a trial or hearing where the opposing party acted in person, “pro se”, as they call it in the United States. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 1:07 pm
United States, 1990 WL 124496, at *3 (9th Cir. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 6:41 pm
United States, 713 F.2d 728, 730 (Fed. [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 6:47 am
Whistleblower DQ of Assistant US Attorney Denied: “United States v. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 5:00 am
Herrick v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 9:58 am
State of Florida, 992 So.2d 218 (Fla. 2008)(read the opinion here), the highest court in the state held that having mental illness doesn't automatically bring with it an Eighth Amendment shield from capital punishment. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 8:22 am
United States, a prosecutor's office has an affirmative obligation to maintain a record-keeping system ensuring that all lawyers in the office have access to information about promises to witnesses. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 1:30 am
In short, it is now black-letter law in the United States that personal information can only be collected for disclosed and contextually relevant purposes. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 6:13 pm
” United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:35 pm
United States, 556 U.S. 559 (2009). [read post]
