Search for: "State v. Anthony S."
Results 921 - 940
of 4,786
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jan 2019, 12:05 pm
To briefly recap, the main point at issue in Knick is whether the Court should overrule or limit Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 8:27 am
Lewis, 138 S. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 10:31 am
An opinion out of the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals this week entitled, State of Texas v. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 2:51 pm
Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit’s February 2018 ruling in Newton v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 11:48 am
By Anthony B. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 11:08 am
Anthony v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 9:51 am
” In 1984, in United States v. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 2:11 pm
Led by Robert Rucho, who headed the state senate’s redistricting committee, North Carolina Republicans took their case to the Supreme Court. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 4:14 am
” At Reason’s Volokh Conspiracy blog, Orin Kerr offers his take on why the plaintiffs in Frank v. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 10:32 am
Franchise Tax Board of California v. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 4:23 am
’” At SI Live, Daniel Leddy argues that “[t]wo recent votes by [Chief Justice John] Roberts are further evidence that he’s turning into another Anthony Kennedy. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 7:07 am
In Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 6:28 am
Kutler’s entry on New York Times Co. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 2:22 pm
Plaintiffs in Daubert v. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 3:07 am
In the Benisek case, the Court's per-curium opinion let a lower-court ruling stand that allowed elections to proceed under the state's current election map. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 8:43 am
In the New Jersey Supreme Court case, State v. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 8:36 am
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31 and South Dakota v. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 1:00 am
Supreme Court’s Decision in Granholm v. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 1:00 am
Supreme Court’s Decision in Granholm v. [read post]
23 Dec 2018, 7:53 am
Anthony responded to the suit pro se. [read post]
