Search for: "State v. Hedge"
Results 921 - 940
of 1,291
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2011, 7:05 pm
As a result, choice of law and jurisdiction rules potentially expose firms that do business nationally or internationally to oppressive law in any of the US states. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 9:32 am
(Elliott Associates v. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 9:03 am
Hedge your bets, right, out a little bit. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 7:24 am
Calculated Risk, Zero Hedge, Mish Shedlock, Dr. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 7:39 am
Martel Building Ltd. v Canada, [1997] 129 FTR 249 (FCTD), revd [1998] 163 DLR (4th) 504 (FCA), leave to appeal refused, 2000 SCC 60, [2000] 2 SCR 860, online: LexUM http://scc.lexum.org/en/2000/2000scc60/2000scc60.html Facts Note: This case deals with the possibility of a tort action in negligence for breach of a duty of care during negotiation of a contract (specifically during the solicitation and evaluation of tendered bids). [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 7:39 am
Martel Building Ltd. v Canada, [1997] 129 FTR 249 (FCTD), revd [1998] 163 DLR (4th) 504 (FCA), leave to appeal refused, 2000 SCC 60, [2000] 2 SCR 860, online: LexUM http://scc.lexum.org/en/2000/2000scc60/2000scc60.html Facts Note: This case deals with the possibility of a tort action in negligence for breach of a duty of care during negotiation of a contract (specifically during the solicitation and evaluation of tendered bids). [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 5:00 am
To get a sense as to how the Justices might rule in Janus v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 2:28 am
Part V will review the legal basis on which the majority rests its authority for the rules, likely to be challenged in court. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:00 am
Indeed counsel for Janus group Petitioners at oral argument stated that “[T]he policy says funds are not intended for market timing. [read post]
Even More on "The Facebook and Goldman Saga: All About Section 12(g) and Section 12(h) Applications"
11 Jan 2011, 4:29 am
Here are some of the latest entries: - KPMG's "2010 International Audit Committee Survey" - Rumor Has It: The Art of Managing Speculation - All I Really Need to Know I Learned Reading Escott v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 1:12 am
Supreme Court’s holding in Morrison v. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 6:00 am
UK branches of firms whose home state is within the EEA are not required to apply the Code as their home state will be required to apply equivalent provisions under CRD3. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 5:24 pm
Related Web Resources: United States v. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 11:06 am
Benson, 409 U.S. 63 (1972), Parker v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 10:04 am
I've read Com. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 6:33 am
The North American Securities Administrators Association (NASAA) has filed a joint amicus brief with AARP in the case of Janus Capital Partners v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 2:10 am
Silver of the United States District Court for the District of Arizona denied a motion to exclude evidence of the patent reexamination of the ’894 patent-in-suit in Integrated Technology Corp. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 12:24 pm
(The prospectuses of Janus mutual funds stated that market timing was prohibited; meanwhile, Janus allegedly accepted payments from hedge funds to market-time those funds and thus to siphon returns from long-term investors.) [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 5:37 pm
For reasons that are far from apparent, AUCC negotiated renewed arrangements following CCH v. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 7:09 am
In June, The Louisiana Court of Appeals published their opinion for Watts V. [read post]
