Search for: "State v. Levine"
Results 921 - 940
of 1,753
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Oct 2010, 7:16 am
Levine Samuel, LLP Gerald M. [read post]
21 Nov 2009, 8:30 pm
Owners Corp. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 2:15 am
Levine [read post]
18 Jan 2015, 11:06 am
The federal case (Levin v. [read post]
18 Jan 2015, 11:06 am
The federal case (Levin v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 3:10 am
Levine, and concurrently with democratic efforts in Congress to overturn Medtronic v. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 2:08 am
Levine E-Mail gmlevine@researchtheworld.com [read post]
5 May 2022, 9:08 pm
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 5:18 am
Next on the agenda is Levin, Tax Commissioner of Ohio v. [read post]
17 Jun 2012, 5:18 am
When the United States Supreme Court decides an issue, it is binding on all federal courts throughout the country. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 11:42 am
Levine that federal prescription drug laws did not preempt a plaintiff’s state failure-to-warn claim against a brand-name manufacturer. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 4:10 am
This was the point made by the court in Levine v New York City Transit Authority, 70 AD2d 900, affirmed 49 NY2d 747. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 8:00 am
Union, Local 371 v City of N.Y., Dept. of Juvenile Justice, 82 A.D.3d 644 _____________________ A Reasonable Disciplinary Penalty Under the Circumstances - A 600+ page guide to penalties imposed on public employees in New York State found guilty of selected acts of misconduct. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 5:11 pm
Levine, 108 N.J. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 5:10 pm
Levine, 108 N.J. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 2:24 am
Levine E-Mail gmlevine@researchtheworld.com [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 3:27 pm
Diana Levine is the “Levine” in Wyeth v. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 8:03 am
Levine, where the Court held, 6-3, that even if a drug has been approved by the FDA, patients may still sue the drug manufacturer in state court. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 4:41 am
Perry (the challenge to California’s Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2008, 4:00 am
United States v. [read post]
