Search for: "State v. London"
Results 921 - 940
of 4,122
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2019, 2:45 pm
When the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) ruled in the case of Kelo v. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 12:02 pm
The DSM Directive provides a current example of this: its provisions are so complex that in essence the “battlefield” has moved from Strasbourg and Brussels to the Member States that will need to transpose the directive.Sophie then asked the panel a recap of the 3 best and worst contributions by the CJEU.The best 3 contributions of the CJEU according to Eleonora were:The dialogue between the CJEU and the national courts, which at times has been unavoidable (eg where the language… [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 1:05 am
In a subsequent case, (R (Goloshvili) v Secretary of State [2019]), a landlord was issued with a Notice of Letting to Disqualified Person and was warned that if they did not evict the tenant they could “face an unlimited fine or be sent to prison for up to five years. [read post]
17 Mar 2019, 5:35 pm
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 1:27 pm
PulseOn's design shared the fate of those in PMS v Magmatic, Samsung v Apple and P&G v RB: valid, but not infringed.Is it still worth bothering to register designs? [read post]
10 Mar 2019, 5:08 pm
United States The Cyberlaw Clinic reports that it has filed an amicus curiae brief (.pdf) in the United States Supreme Court in Oracle v. [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 7:02 am
While bringing the US tariff dispute to the WTO on January 29, 2019, China asserted that the US’s actions to block AB appointments are arguably “illegitimate” because DSU Article 17.2 requires that “[v]acancies shall be filled as they arise”. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 3:32 pm
This is significant because section 715.32(3) prevents the prosecutor from considering the national economic interest in deciding whether to offer an opportunity to negotiate a remediation agreement: Despite paragraph (2)(i), if the organization is alleged to have committed an offence under section 3 or 4 of the Corruption of Foreign Public Officials Act, the prosecutor must not consider the national economic interest, the potential effect on relations with a state other than Canada or the… [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 7:59 am
In referring to the recent TCL v Ericsson decision from the Central District of California (see Kat post here), Judge Labson stated:"The Court is not persuaded by Plaintiffs’ argument that summary judgment on Count III of the FAC is warranted. [read post]
3 Mar 2019, 4:51 pm
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 1:23 pm
O’Keeffe v. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 6:00 am
Shamima Begum According to CNN, at the age of 15, Shamima Begum, who was born and raised in the United Kingdom, flew out of London’s Gatwick Airport with two other classmates in 2015 and entered Syria to join the Islamic State. [read post]
24 Feb 2019, 4:23 pm
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 4:02 pm
The fruition of that absorption of DP law into Article 8 is apparent in the recent decision of Catt v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:44 pm
City of New London and New London Development Company, 843 A2d 500 (Conn. 2004), cert. granted, 125 S. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 10:32 am
City of New London both indicate that the “for public use” portion of the Takings Clause restricts condemnations further than normal due process limits on state police power. [read post]
17 Feb 2019, 4:06 pm
Women and AI: Harms, Impacts and Remedies, Information Law and Policy Centre, 17 Russell Square, London WC1B 5DR, 7 March 2019, 17.00 to 19.00. [read post]
16 Feb 2019, 9:51 am
" In CRDA v. [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 10:47 pm
Google, or who debated the Blizzard v. bnetd DMCA case with me back in the day. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 4:51 am
Corp. v Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., 27 NY3d 616, 620 [2016]; see Hyatt v State of Cal. [read post]
