Search for: "State v. Means"
Results 921 - 940
of 61,161
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jul 2015, 6:58 am
It also means property owners need to make sure the pool structure, gates, barriers, drains and other elements meet state safety requirements. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 3:57 am
State law claims survive ADA claim dismissalGiordano v City of New York, CA2, 274 F.3d 740The Giordano case illustrates the fact that sometimes it is possible to maintain a discrimination lawsuit under state law notwithstanding the fact that the federal courts have dismissed similar claims alleging violations of federal law.In such situations the state courts should make the determination based on state law and not consider the action taken by the federal… [read post]
15 May 2020, 2:36 pm
United States and Skilling v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 12:01 pm
In Howes v. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 1:20 pm
” What does this statement mean? [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 8:56 am
United States and Gould v. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 9:30 pm
Samantha Barbas, State University of New York Buffalo Law School, has posted When Privacy Almost Won: Time, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 5:06 am
In Georgia v. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 4:43 pm
See, e.g., Langfitt v. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 4:43 pm
See, e.g., Langfitt v. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 4:23 am
NS v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Amnesty International Ltd and others intervening); ME and others v Refugee Applications Comr and another (Amnesty International Ltd and others intervening); (Joined Cases C-411/10 and C-493/10); [2011] WLR (D) 388 “European Union law precluded the application of a conclusive presumption that the member state responsible for examining an asylum claim pursuant to Council Regulation… [read post]
12 Jan 2018, 1:20 pm
See also Minnesota v. [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 9:08 pm
United States, supra, 98 U.S. at page 164; Watson v. [read post]
Hensel Phelps v. San Diego interprets what is a Public Work for the Application of Prevailing Wages.
2 Aug 2011, 11:45 am
In Hensel Phelps Construction Co. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 3:05 pm
The Supreme Court released an interesting opinion today in Mead v. [read post]
24 May 2017, 1:49 pm
United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 8:39 am
Miller v. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 9:58 am
However, the ruling doesn't mean that former spouses automatically are entitled to a portion of their ex's military retirement pay, and each case is decided according to individual facts and state law. [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 5:00 am
The term also means (1) any agent of such a person, and (2) a State or political subdivision of a State and any agency or instrumentality of a State or a political subdivision of a State, and any interstate agency, but such term does not include the United States, or a corporation wholly owned by the Government of the United States. [read post]
