Search for: "State v. Richardson" Results 921 - 940 of 1,070
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2022, 4:18 pm by INFORRM
United States On 31 January 2022, the EARN IT Act was reintroduced to the Senate by Senator Richard Blumenthal and 18 co-sponsors from both parties. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 1:37 am by INFORRM
Article 23 of the draft NIS Directive states that “Member States shall ensure that the TLD registries and the entities providing domain name registration services for the TLD publish, without undue delay after the registration of a domain name, domain registration data which are not personal data. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 7:06 pm
U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals, July 28, 2008 Richardson v. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 6:45 am
(Afro-IP)   Spain Trade mark cancellation and damages: a matter of (bad) faith (Class 46)   United Kingdom EWHC (Pat): No ruling on hypothetical issue: MMI Research Ltd v Cellxion Ltd (IPKat) EWHC (Pat): EP 258 valid in Netherlands but not UK: Novartis AG and Cibavision AG v Johnson & Johnson Medical Ltd & Ors (PatLit) EWHC: Trial judge says ‘Boileau’ to patent licence; appeal court agrees: Oxonica Energy Ltd v Neuftec… [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 2:40 pm
Richardson School of Law—Implementing Free Prior and Informed Consent: Expanding the Role of Communities in the Global Energy Transition 4:45 pm – 6:00 pm Closing of Conference and Reception   __________George Foster started with an introduction setting the stage for the materials to come. [read post]
16 Dec 2006, 5:46 am
[Update, December 16: Appalachian State repeated as national champion and won the game, 28-17, as Kevin Richardson ran for 179 yards and 4 touchdowns.]4. [read post]
3 Jul 2016, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Bailii has recently made available a judgment of 22 June 2016 in the case of Richardson v Google UK Ltd [2016] EWHC 1534 (QB)) in which Sir David Eady made an extended civil restraint order against the claimant. [read post]
3 May 2010, 3:01 am
’ not descriptive as a matter of law: Zobmondo Entertainment, LLC v. [read post]