Search for: "State v. Stanley" Results 921 - 940 of 1,053
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Aug 2008, 12:54 am
: (Holman’s Biotech IP Blog), Daiichi’s open offer for 20% in Ranbaxy awaits Sebi nod: (GenericsWeb), Australia/India: Strides shows thumbs up for Indian generic industry acquiring controlling interest in Ascent: (Spicy IP), Europe: Significant date ahead for EU Paediatric Regulation: (SPC Blog), India: Grave diggers, ‘immoral’ patent and the National Biotech Regulatory Authority: (Spicy IP), UK: Monster trade mark infringement case: court reveals its thinking… [read post]
We
14 Feb 2011, 12:00 pm by Nicholas Moline
Martin III, Harvard Law School; Judy Meadows, State Law Library of Montana; John G. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 9:00 am by Ritika Singh
Rozina Ali, senior editor at the Cairo Review of Global Affairs, has an op-ed in Al Jazeera America about the recent Hassan v. [read post]
We
14 Feb 2011, 12:00 pm by Nicholas Moline
Martin III, Harvard Law School; Judy Meadows, State Law Library of Montana; John G. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:44 am by Bruce Ackerman
For example, the New Deal/Civil Rights legacy may well give new support to religious conservatives, like Michael McConnell, who argue that the pervasive state interventionism of the modern era require a change in the constitutional base-line for assessing religious access to public facilities and subsidies. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 5:00 am by Steve McConnell
Finally, on this most American of holidays, we cannot ignore the Eleventh Circuit's decision in Farias v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 12:11 am by Kevin LaCroix
 The banks that have been identified or made announcements regarding Forex regulatory investigations to date include: Barclays, Citigroup, Inc., Credit Suisse AG, Deutsche Bank, Goldman Sachs Group, HSBC, JP Morgan Chase & Co., Morgan Stanley, Royal Bank of Scotland, Standard Chartered and UBS. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 6:34 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
El Tribunal Supremo de los Estados Unidos determinó en Employment Division v. [read post]