Search for: "State v. State Racing Commission" Results 921 - 940 of 1,647
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Sep 2015, 9:02 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
On September 16, 2015, the federal government decided to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada the case of Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) v. [read post]
AB 1354 would amend Government Code section 12990 to require, of each employer with over 100 employees that is or wishes to be a state contractor or subcontractor, a nondiscrimination program that includes policies and procedures designed to ensure equal employment opportunities for all applicants and employees, an analysis of employment selection procedures, and a workforce analysis that contains the total number of workers, the total wages, and the total hours worked annually, with a… [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 7:28 am by Joy Waltemath
EO 13665 amends EO 11246, which already prohibits discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, and national origin. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 6:28 am by The Public Employment Law Press
To bring a claim under Title VII, explained the court, a plaintiff must first have filed a complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) or a state equivalent - here, the New York State Division of Human Rights - as Courts may only hear claims “reasonably related” to allegations set forth in the administrative complaint. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 6:47 am by Christina Hausner
  Subsequent cases relied on Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
18 Jul 2015, 8:28 am by Nassiri Law
Additional Resources: Uber may become an issue in the US presidential race as Hillary Clinton vows to crack down on worker ‘misclassification‘, July 13, 2015, Huffington Post More Blog Entries: Adams v. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 12:41 pm by Alan White
The Supreme Court made a noteworthy contribution to the crescendo in our national conversation about race in its recent Texas v. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 11:17 pm by Jarod Bona
In fact, after the Supreme Court’s decision in North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]