Search for: "State v. Taylor"
Results 921 - 940
of 3,051
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2013, 6:28 am
Taylor, II, and Wendy Jean ConnorCase number: 12-cv-1249 (United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia)Case filed: April 12, 2012Qualifying Judgment/Order: March 7, 2013 4/15/2013 7/15/2013 2013-33 SEC v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 7:49 am
Reversed and remanded.Case Name: GARY LEE CARTER v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 2:05 pm
" Lord & Taylor, LLC v. [read post]
25 Dec 2016, 10:01 pm
Acceptance of the writ, which is rare, would mean the two DeCoster v. [read post]
7 Sep 2007, 10:43 am
State of Indiana (NFP) John Taylor v. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 11:25 am
Taylor and Tom C. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 10:43 pm
See Shepard v. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 3:02 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 6:56 am
” Other commentary focuses on Monday’s summary reversal in Taylor v. [read post]
11 Mar 2007, 11:57 pm
Taylor, 2006 U.S. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 9:37 am
Taylor v. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 10:51 am
Those rules were set aside by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in May, 2017, in the published opinion Taylor v. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 11:42 am
Another case, Taylor v Hammondsport CSD, 267 A.D.2d 987, brought by a teacher, David C. [read post]
30 Jan 2010, 7:05 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 4:19 am
Karass, State Controller, et al. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 4:25 am
Court rules that the appointing authority made its appointments consistent with the requirements of Section 61.1 of the Civil Service Law Cherry v New York State Civ. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 2:42 pm
The US Supreme Court is currently deciding several cases that involve free speech, such as NRA v. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 11:54 am
In two cases decided on December 19, 2016, United States v. [read post]
1 May 2014, 4:00 am
Make whole any unit employees who retired during or after August 2011 and who have been required to contribute towards the cost of health insurance.* In Lippman v Sewanhaka Central High School District, 66 NY2d 313, the court held that health insurance was not a retirement benefit within the meaning of Article 5, Section 7, of the State Constitution.. [read post]
