Search for: "State v. Waters" Results 921 - 940 of 9,935
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jul 2011, 6:00 am by Trevor Cutaiar
Pool Offshore, Inc., 182 F.2d 353 (5th Cir. 1999) was still good law in light of the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Stewart v. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 7:10 pm
  Back in 2006, the 5th Circuit in United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2024, 3:16 am by Dan Filler
This just in: The landscape of the Second Amendment has radically shifted post-New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 7:05 am by Gritsforbreakfast
The water-cooled supercomputers there require 1.7 million gallons of water per day to function.That water is being supplied by a political subdivision of the State of Utah. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 11:38 am
A unanimous panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit has held that the United States Department of the Interior violated the Outer Continental Shelf Deep Water Royalty Relief Act (“RRA”) by imposing price threshold conditions that require federal lessees to pay royalties when commodity prices rise. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 7:02 am
[I don't know what I find more confusing, that a violation of the clean air act is found in the Water Code or that the Water Code is not just for riparian rights anymore. [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 12:51 pm
Following up on Michael's post: "It sets a horrendous precedent in terms of these cases when you're talking about a policy sold in Mississippi providing wind coverage, but that has to pay several hundred thousand in water damages and several... [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 12:14 pm by Native American Rights Fund
Olney (Criminal Jurisdiction) State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2015state.htmlDiana v. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 8:20 am by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
The Supreme Court rendered its much-anticipated decision in Graham County Soil and Water Conservation District, et al. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 2:21 pm by WIMS
WATER, United States Ninth Circuit, Case No. 11-35954. [read post]