Search for: "Taylor v. State"
Results 921 - 940
of 3,327
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 9:42 am
Order Reversing Judgment and Sentence November 14, 2013Case Name: TAYLOR FORREST COBB v. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 6:18 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2008, 10:51 pm
Per Sweets v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 6:58 am
Taylor, 529 U.S. at 410, 120 S.Ct. at 1522 (“[A]n unreasonable application of federal law is different from an incorrect application of federal law. [read post]
9 May 2021, 6:42 am
However: Mr Taylor stated the bank statements showed payments from 5 people. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 3:13 am
The basic issue the Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit was asked to resolve in the Taylor case was whether or not Taylor’s employee contributions to the Retirement System, required by State law, was “disposable income” within the meaning of the federal Bankruptcy Code. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 8:51 am
The Honorable Judge William Fletcher Taylor-ed to a T.Menendez v. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 3:46 am
Doyle v. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 4:11 am
Taylor. [read post]
2 Nov 2008, 7:46 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 5:00 am
This case was also discussed in an earlier post: Did Kentucky's Dram Shop Act Survive Taylor v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 5:13 am
’“ Taylor v. [read post]
13 May 2008, 11:22 am
LEXIS 37602, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 4:21 am
Taylor Jr. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 5:45 am
In Taylor v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 9:01 am
Louisiana (on the constitutionality of the death penalty for child rape) No. 07-371, Taylor v. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 5:00 am
LEXIS 18624 (ND NY, Feb. 8, 2017), a New York federal magistrate judge recommended dismissing the complaint of a number of Muslim inmates that their 1st and 14th Amendment rights were violated when they were not allowed to attend Jumm'ah services on Dec. 25, 2015.In Taylor v. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 7:28 am
Taylor, 465 F.3d 174 (5th Cir.2006); Darby v. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 4:28 am
The Court also observed that nuisance does not protect privacy in related jurisdictions, referring to the High Court of Australia decision in Victoria Park Racing and Recreation Grounds Co Ltd v Taylor ((1937) 58 CLR 479). [read post]
