Search for: "Thomas Read"
Results 921 - 940
of 15,916
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Oct 2023, 4:41 am
“Biden believes he has the moral authority here,” said Thomas R. [read post]
15 Oct 2023, 4:51 pm
The Mirror’s retraction and apology can be read here. [read post]
14 Oct 2023, 3:57 am
"Writes Thomas Friedman, in "Why Israel Is Acting This Way" (NYT).If Friedman's use of the word crazy bothers you, you should read the whole column. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 7:47 pm
The post The Top 3 Generative-AI Copyright Issues appeared first on Cokato Copyright Attorney: The Law Blog of Thomas James. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 9:59 am
Landmark’s citations “contain no explanation of how that data is ‘analyzed’ or how one would program the ‘processor’ to conduct such processing,” explained District Judge Thomas Schroeder. [read post]
12 Oct 2023, 4:36 am
Here’s the Thursday morning read: Supreme Court seems skeptical of finding that South Carolina congressional district was racial gerrymander (Melissa Quinn, CBS News) Cities are asking the Supreme Court for more power to clear homeless encampments (Rachel Cohen, Vox) Trump’s claim that he can’t be prosecuted collides with precedents (Adam Liptak, The New York Times) Supreme Court petitioned to stop Florida sports betting (Zak Thomas-Akoo, iGaming Business) Texas… [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 9:07 am
He quoted Dylan Thomas, and I’d never heard of Dylan Thomas. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 5:45 am
Read the opinion The post JONATHAN THOMAS MATTHEWS v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 3:48 am
Jared Malsin, Ken Thomas, and Nancy A. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 12:06 pm
Thomas Aquinas were sprinkled throughout their speeches, and their ability to argue in a sophisticated way was impressive.Why were they so unusually well educated in that way? [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 9:47 pm
E-cigarette manufacturer liability While initially denying that e-cigarettes are unsafe, e-cigarette industry leaders such as Thomas Kiklas of the Tobacco Vapor Electronic Cigarette Association now acknowledges that there are occasional failures. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 3:50 pm
Five years ago I read Las Casas's most famous work, "A Short Account of the Destruction of the Indies," which he published in 1542. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 8:09 am
I was reading through a recent trial transcript and enjoyed the following historical introduction to the jury system offered by Judge Gilstrap. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 3:52 am
Department of Justice, representing the Defendant’s perspective; and Thomas Peckham of Nordhaus Law Firm, LLC representing the Tribal Plaintiffs’ perspective. [read post]
7 Oct 2023, 8:57 am
Yelling was later suspended and eventually fired, based on other allegations; she sued alleging retaliation and discrimination (read the opinion for more on that) and racial harassment: To succeed on a racially hostile work environment claim under Title VII or § 1981, Yelling must prove: (1) she belongs to a protected class, (2) she experienced unwelcome harassment, (3) the harassment was based on her race, (4) the harassment was sufficiently severe or pervasive to alter the terms of… [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 9:41 am
Thomas More Society writes about the importance of protecting controversial speech. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 7:37 am
Here’s the Friday morning read: Racial gerrymandering returns to U.S. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 4:30 am
In West Virginia v EPA, Chief Justice Roberts explained this limit as follows while invalidating an important environmental regulation the EPA was considering: In certain extraordinary cases, both separation of powers principles and a practical understanding of legislative intent make us reluctant to read into ambiguous statutory text the delegation claimed to be lurking there. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 2:03 am
Michael Gove has been quoted as not being able to ‘guarantee’ that the Renters Reform Bill will make its second reading before the Kings Speech on November 7th. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 8:09 am
Justices Thomas, Gorsuch, and Alito appeared highly skeptical of the Bureau’s claim that the Appropriations Clause allows for the Bureau’s funding to be a cap rather than a specified amount and for the Bureau to determine how much money it needs, rather than Congress Conversely, Justices Kagan, Sotomayor, and Jackson repeatedly challenged CFSA as to why the Appropriations Clause necessarily requires an exact funding number rather than a cap on spending Justice Barrett questioned… [read post]
