Search for: "U.S. v. King*" Results 921 - 940 of 4,531
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2020, 6:05 am
ESG in the Mainstream: Sell-Side Analysts Addressing ESG Concerns Posted by David Katz, Sabastian V. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Campaign Funds for Judges Warp Criminal Justice, Study Finds New York Times – Adam Liptak | Published: 6/1/2020 In Gideon v. [read post]
26 May 2020, 2:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
A digital services tax like the one implemented by France likely violates both the General Agreement on Trade in Services and a model U.S. free trade agreement. [read post]
17 May 2020, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
On the same day Nicol J handed down judgment in the case of Notting Hill Genesis v Ali. [read post]
11 May 2020, 5:41 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  The law firm sues an incorrect governmental entity, in this case the City of New York rather than the U.S. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]