Search for: "UNITED STATE FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT"
Results 921 - 940
of 36,411
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2024, 1:55 pm
The newest district court judges of the Eastern District of Louisiana, Darrel James Papillion and Brandon Long, will offer pointers and their preferences for practicing in federal court. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 1:41 pm
Babak Sarani, et al., Wounding Patterns Based on Firearm Type in Civilian Public Mass Shootings in the United States, 228 J. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 12:00 pm
The Judicial Conference of the United States recently directed federal district courts to assign cases that seek broad relief, such as a challenge to a federal regulation, randomly on a district-wide basis. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 9:46 am
United States and Rita v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 9:30 am
“Even though the Comstock law does not ban abortion literally,” Mitchell has explained, “it bans the shipment or receipt of any abortion-related equipment,” and no abortion takes place in the United States without some item sent in the mail. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 7:37 am
A federal district court recently granted the United States’ Motion for Default Judgment against the quick-service burger restaurant franchise concept, Burgerim Group USA, Inc. and its owner (“Burgerim”). [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 6:43 am
The representation is particularly common in mass torts, where states and local governments sue companies for public nuisance. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
Defendant removed the case to federal court and a United States District Court for the Southern District of New York granted Defendant's motion to dismiss all of Plaintiff's claims under both Human Rights Laws. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
Defendant removed the case to federal court and a United States District Court for the Southern District of New York granted Defendant's motion to dismiss all of Plaintiff's claims under both Human Rights Laws. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
” 20 Following such precedent, federal appellate courts have repeatedly cautioned against a mechanical or formulaic application of the economic reality test, 21 and specifically warned that no single factor is controlling and the list of factors is not exhaustive. 22 Contrary to the core-factor emphasis of the 2021 IC Rule, the Final Rule reverts to a multi-factor totality of circumstances test that does not ascribe weight to any factor. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 4:10 am
The Michigan federal district court said in part:The city’s alleged failure to improve the air quality of its residents does not give rise to a free exercise claim because that failure impacts city residents without regard to their religion.... [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
17 Mar 2024, 8:04 pm
In United States v. [read post]
17 Mar 2024, 10:34 am
That would be an unfortunately crabbed view of the Conference’s statutory authority to “prescribe general rules of practice and procedure . . . in the United States district courts. [read post]
The Supreme Court Cannot Ignore the National Security Implications of the So-Called ‘Jawboning’ Case
17 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
The district court and the U.S. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 9:37 pm
Blinken, (D NM, March 13, 2024), a New Mexico federal district court dismissed challenges to the denial of an R-1 (Temporary Religious Worker) visa for Stefen Green, a South African citizen who was to be hired as Calvary Church's Worship Director. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 9:31 pm
Sorting Fact From Fiction Murthy v Missouri started out as Missouri v Biden, a complaint filed with the US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana against President Joe Biden, several federal agencies, and government officials. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 11:06 am
The Sixth Circuit recently reminded us of this in United States v. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 6:39 am
Prong One: The Court grounded the first prong of its state action test in the “bedrock requirement that ‘the conduct allegedly causing the deprivation of a federal right be fairly attributable to the State.'” Quoting Lugar. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 1:45 pm
Here’s the background: first, a federal district court judge down in Austin heard the case and ruled that SB4 “…threatens the fundamental notion that the United States must regulate immigration with one voice. [read post]