Search for: "United States v. AT&T, Inc." Results 921 - 940 of 7,911
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2007, 9:48 am
After Teva Pharmaceuticals appealed the dismissal of its declaratory judgment action in District Court, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has taken a fresh new look at things in light of the Supreme Court's decision in MedImmune, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 6:15 am
Mulligan V , Attorney On Friday August 10, 2012, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit overturned a district court's decision to dismiss the claims filed by Rachel Krumpelbeck in a product liability suit against Breg, Inc., a manufacturer of pain pumps and other medical devices. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 5:09 am by Sheppard Mullin
On June 25, 2010, the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board ("TTAB") of the United States Patent and Trademark Office rendered its decision in the case of Valentino U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2010, 8:06 am by Jed
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in Timothy S. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 6:25 am
Last year, we took a look at the case of Helmsley-Spear, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 9:02 am by Eric Goldman
Background: State Sovereign Immunity The Eleventh Amendment to the Constitution provides: “The Judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens of another State, or by Citizens or Subjects of any Foreign State. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 1:45 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
While courts generally recognize and enforce contractual agreements by a party to consent to jurisdiction, mere registration of an out-of-state business to do business in a state historically has not been recognized as creating the necessary “substantial minimum contacts” that the Due Process clause of the United States Constitution generally requires exist to provide the general personal jurisdiction that must exist for a state court to… [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 1:50 pm
Medtronic, Inc., 784 F.3d 1335, 1341-45 (10th Cir. 2015)(finding no federal regulation that paralleled state common law claimsand further concluding that state law off-label promotion claim was preempted by § 360k); United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 8:18 am by Matthew Lanahan
Perry (the challenge to California’s ban on same-sex marriage) and United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 12:00 am by David Hartley
Jan. 10, 2018), the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York denied securities lawyer Norman T. [read post]