Search for: "United States v. All Right, Title & Interest"
Results 921 - 940
of 2,611
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Aug 2017, 7:00 am
And as the Supreme Court held the 1983 case Immigration and Naturalization Service v. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 1:41 pm
Allegations of the White and Hispanic New Haven Firefighters’ Lawsuit Some of the white and Hispanic firefighters who likely would have been promoted based on their test scores sued the City and some of its officials, alleging that by discarding the test results they discriminated against the plaintiffs based on race, in violation of both Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United… [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 2:37 pm
Excepted service agencies set their own qualification requirements; they are not subject to the appointment, pay, and classification rules of Title 5, United States Code. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
CITIZENS UNITED, ELANA KAGAN, AND THE QUESTION THAT HAD NO PLAUSIBLE ANSWERMost liberals and progressives view Citizens United v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 8:00 am
These are commonly viewed as “rights,” and a major purpose of a constitution is thought to be the safeguarding of rights against what is often, especially in the United States, termed the “tyranny of the majority. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
Under Employment Div. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 3:35 am
See United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2013, 11:18 pm
The couple had assigned all the rights in their personality to the plaintiff for use in the advertisements in all media, including print and video. [read post]
30 Apr 2016, 12:10 pm
Perhaps the Citizens United group gets the same outcome, but not all corporations. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 12:45 pm
There, the plaintiff’s allegation that he was strip searched “by female guards, and that no effort has been made to accommodate his privacy interests” stated a claim for violation of bodily integrity. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
If law is not neutral or not generally applicable, ordinary strict scrutiny applies: the government must prove a compelling interest and that the law is narrowly tailored The right is only good against the government (state action) 2. 1972Singular Departure from Ordered Liberty CasesWisconsin v. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 2:48 pm
NOTE: The Supreme Court case set for argument on Wednesday, Sept. 9, Citizens United v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 7:23 pm
However, life of copyright contracts (with important exceptions) are unenforceable in all 50 states. [read post]
18 Aug 2012, 5:31 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 12:02 pm
Section 292 of the United States Patent Act (35 U.S.C. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 6:30 am
As David points out very early, the Court recognized and embraced implied powers fourteen years earlier, in United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 2:54 pm
Under the Ninth Circuit’s reasoning, which is left standing, “lawfully made under this title” ... limits the first sale exhaustion doctrine to goods sold in the United States. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 5:42 am
I wouldn't say "the court was sending abortion rights to the states. [read post]
25 May 2007, 4:24 am
May 16, 2007)at the 9th Circuit WebsiteThe opinion is also available online at Stanford Cyberlawand at LawGeek (Jason Schulz)The copyright infringement case discussed in this posting and just decided in the 9th Circuit of the United States Court of Appeals really has it all. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 8:02 am
”Confronting the Truth(United States Institute of Peace, 2006; documentary on truth commissions)http://www.law.berkeley.edu/library/dynamic/dvds.phpShows how countrieswhich have experienced massive human rights violations have created official, independent bodies known as truth commissions, and documents the work of these commissions in South Africa,Peru, East Timor, and Morocco.Le Conseil Constitutionnel (France, 2010; videos of Frenchconstitutional council/court… [read post]
