Search for: "United States v. Davi" Results 921 - 940 of 3,059
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Nov 2013, 1:54 pm
Filed: November 7, 2013 (unpublished)Opinion by: Judge Andre Davis Held: the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina was not clearly erroneous and did not abuse its discretion  in ruling that (1) the parties reached a binding and enforceable oral settlement agreement; and (2) plaintiff did not proceed in bad faith, so neither a dismissal with prejudice nor an award of attorney's fees was appropriate.Facts: Plaintiff made a $12… [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 12:56 pm by Susan Brenner
During the time that she lived at Betty Shabazz Village, Davis worked at the United States Attorney's Office and the U.S. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 1:22 pm by PaulKostro
Noel, 157 N.J. 141, 146-47 (1999); see also United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 3:34 am
Charles Henn Jr. - Brand owners sometimes face United States Patent and Trademark Office “failure to function” refusals to register their trademarks. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 11:28 am by Charles Davis
Kavanaugh’s views on that subject can best be inferred from an opinion he wrote shortly after the Supreme Court’s 2010 decision, written by Justice Anthony Kennedy, in Citizens United v. [read post]
26 May 2017, 3:29 pm by Eugene Volokh
Even if Plaintiffs’ public nudity at political rallies was entitled to First Amendment protection, however, we hold that the challenged ordinance is a valid, content-neutral regulation as applied to Plaintiffs’ expressive conduct under United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 11:37 am by Josh Blackman
Justice Gorsuch was the most interested questioner on whether the President was an "Officer of the United States. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 2:00 pm by Kate Fort
Instead, the Supreme Court’s decision left ICWA unscathed and affirmed the constitutional relationship between tribal nations and the United States. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 5:00 am by John Jascob
Davis’s view, corporate political spending is driven by business decisions that the Raskin amendment may convert into partisan political decisions. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 9:44 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
" ]See for example 62 F. 3d 1512 - Hilton Davis Chemical Co v. [read post]
3 Oct 2009, 12:55 am
Samantar eventually resettled in the United States and now lives in Virginia. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 5:01 am by Thalia Kruger
Dodge (Professor, University of California, Davis, School of Law) & Wenliang Zhang (Associate Professor, Renmin University of China Law School) In Shanghai Yongrun Investment Management Co. v. [read post]