Search for: "United States v. Jones"
Results 921 - 940
of 3,380
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2017, 8:15 am
To see what we mean, one need only look to United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 9:13 pm
United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 1:10 pm
United States and Microsoft v. i4i garnered the most coverage. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 10:08 am
§ 1350, allows courts to recognize a cause of action for violations of the law of nations occurring within the territory of a sovereign other than the United States. [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 1:16 pm
United States (Bad Men Clause; Court of Federal Claims) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2022.html In re H.V. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 1:59 am
On Wednesday 19th July the Court will hand-down judgment in Jones v Birmingham City Council and another [2023] UKSC 27. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 10:45 pm
And it expressly overruled the holding in United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 10:05 am
Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Pigott and Jones concur. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 8:56 am
United States and Gould v. [read post]
21 Oct 2007, 6:54 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 7:40 am
The Court also invited the Solicitor General to file briefs expressing the views of the United States in six cases: Coventry Health Care of Missouri, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 6:05 am
The specific software Jones used to identify Dillow is, so far as the briefing reveals, in the sole possession of the Perrysburg PoliceDepartment -- Dillow recites the language of Rule 16 in his Motion in a bid to place the software programs within its scope, but does not specifically allege that the United States Attorney has actual control over that software. . . . [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 4:00 am
For example, when the Supreme Court decided United States v. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 11:33 am
See the Jones v. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 9:37 am
Jones, 475 F.3d 292, 311–12 (6th Cir.2007); see also French v. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 12:10 am
In contrast, the Eighth Circuit has rejected the duplicative aggravating factor theory when applied to the FDPA, see Purkey, 428 F.3d at 762, and the Fifth Circuit has withdrawn its support of the double-counting theory in light of Jones, see United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 5:02 am
Citing People v Weaver (12 NY3d 433) and United States v Jones (132 S Ct 945}, the Court of Appeals ruled that the State agency's action was a search within the meaning of the State and Federal Constitutions and “did not require a warrant” but “on the facts of this case such surveillance was unreasonable”The decision TLC decision is posted on the Internet… [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 5:15 am
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri agreed. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 5:49 am
The Court held two cases in abeyance pending the outcome of People v Bryant, which is currently pending before the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 4:18 pm
(Eugene Volokh) Scott Johnson (PowerLine) reports on this very interesting case (United States v. $35,131.00 in United States Currency (S.D. [read post]
