Search for: "Does 1-10"
Results 9381 - 9400
of 41,681
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Aug 2012, 10:16 pm
And even if a farmer has had no claims in the past 10 years, does not mean he has not had crop losses in the past 10 years. [read post]
27 May 2011, 8:43 pm
Whatever one's thoughts about the approach of its Judges, the fact remains that in that Court, a 1st Offender does run the risk, especially if their case is assigned to 1 particular Judge, of seeing a little time. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 5:56 pm
10. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 2:05 pm
The Court of Justice does not decide the dispute itself. [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 10:16 pm
And even if a farmer has had no claims in the past 10 years, does not mean he has not had crop losses in the past 10 years. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 8:23 am
[1] Tsosie v. [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 3:48 pm
If 1 in 10 taxpayers get their refunds after 21 days, that still works out to about 10 million taxpayers. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 7:03 am
Panel Topics 1. [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 4:27 am
In balancing Article 8 and Article 10 ECHR, the Court proceeded to find the following: Was Article 10 engaged? [read post]
31 Jan 2009, 8:35 am
Justice Stevens does it. [read post]
12 Oct 2012, 1:47 pm
The Supreme Court affirmed, holding that by its plain and unambiguous language, section 212.093(1) does not prohibit county jail inmates from possessing cell phones. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 7:05 am
Bill C-10 includes a new discoverability requirement, providing at Section 9.1(1): The Commission may, in furtherance of its objects, make orders imposing conditions on the carrying on of broadcasting undertakings that the Commission considers appropriate for the implementation of the broadcasting policy set out in subsection 3(1), including conditions respecting(b) the presentation of programs for selection by the public, including the discoverability of… [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 1:17 am
The per curiam decision does not reveal whether the American Medical Association ethical and practice guidelines, discussed more fully below, were raised in support of the plaintiff’s claim. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 11:24 am
Scenario 2 The fraud again occurs on July 4, 2015, but this time, the government does not learn of the fraud until September 1, 2019. [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 6:53 pm
" (8) Notably, Section 19(d)(1) does not condition the Secretary of State's assumption of the powers and duties of the office of President on resignation of her current office, nor does elevation of the Secretary of State raise any constitutional issue of interbranch appointment. (9) The term of office of the Secretary of State does not automatically terminate at noon on the 20th day of January. (10) On January 20, 2009, Condoleeza Rice was (and… [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 11:30 pm
In reply, Kraft asserted that Rule 2.21 applies, by its terms, to Section 1 and 44 applications, and does not mention Section 23 (Supplemental Register) applications.Both parties moved for judgment on the pleadings. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 5:31 am
Her efforts to avoid the additional outstanding balance does not indicate a lack of good faith. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 8:43 am
On September 10, 2015, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in Berman v. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 6:03 am
” 550 at 565 n.10. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 5:01 pm
Claim 1 of the main request before the Board read:1. [read post]
