Search for: "High v State"
Results 9381 - 9400
of 35,522
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Mar 2019, 7:49 am
Supreme Court in Wayfair v. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 2:32 pm
Minnesota State High School League, which applies the federal Equal Protection Clause. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 12:59 pm
It was a necessary analysis because in English law lateral support is owed to land in its natural state only. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 8:53 am
Nierotko, and United States v. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 7:18 am
When a state court or lower federal court defies or evades the high court’s precedents, it challenges the court’s authority. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 4:04 am
At The Daily Caller, Kevin Daley reports that “Christian baker Jack Phillips and the Colorado Civil Rights Commission … have resolved a legal dispute that set Phillips’ religious beliefs against the state’s public accommodations law”; the settlement “provides that the Commission will close an ongoing anti-discrimination probe of Phillips’s Masterpiece Cakeshop,” the subject of a high-profile Supreme Court case last term, “if… [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 7:37 pm
Has held appointments as invited professor in universities in the United States. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 3:18 pm
In this Order, Delaware’s high court cited Turnbull v. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 8:00 am
Medical Protective Co. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 7:41 am
EEOC v. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 7:19 am
The case, West Virginia AFL-CIO v. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 7:10 am
Reviewing the parties’ summary judgment decision, the appeals court concluded that the factors described in United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 5:57 am
Additionally, the petitioners are asking the high court to overturn lifetime industry bans, arguing that such injunctions constitute penalties which are unconstitutional in violation of separation-of-powers principles (Southern Trust Metals, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 3:56 am
Sullivan, Roe v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 11:32 pm
Yesterday (Monday, March 4, 2019) a Qualcomm v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 4:26 pm
In Oxford Architects Partnership v Cheltenham Ladies College, [2006] EWHC 3156 (TCC), the England and Wales High Court (TCC) held:“The Limitation Act 1980 provides a statutory defence which a party may rely on. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 2:29 pm
In Good News, a school district in New York allowed residents to use the local public high school for social, civic, and recreational events. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 11:02 am
In front of those sat a two-foot-long, two-inch-high sign stating: “You Don’t Have To Be Crazy To Work Here… We’ll Train You. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 9:44 am
The panel held that the defendants did not satisfy the five Bauman factors required for a writ of mandamus, Bauman v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 8:56 am
” Today, the justices agreed to decide in Iancu v. [read post]
