Search for: "State v. Downes"
Results 9381 - 9400
of 35,941
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Dec 2021, 5:01 pm
One of the main functions of Supreme Court decisions is to set down clear rules for lower courts to follow in future cases. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 4:54 am
(quoting United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 8:24 am
In Van Horn, et al. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2018, 5:03 am
From Sweezy v. [read post]
8 May 2023, 6:11 am
.'” “Furthermore, Coke says its guidelines for outside counsel explicitly state that the company does not grant advance conflict waivers. [read post]
28 May 2011, 10:04 am
Note that the hard-edged proposals of the 27 May letter had been watered down into the change of policy being just billed as a material planning consideration. [read post]
28 Oct 2024, 5:01 am
Daoud case in March of this year, specifically states, "This order requires the taking down or deletion or deindexing the following links on the internet:," followed by several links, including those on sites run by (among others) CBS News, Miami Herald, the Daily Mail, and me. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 9:00 pm
Constitution concerning federal elections are properly understood), the higher likelihood is that the Justices will decide whether to grant full review in the case before the Court winds down the October 2021 Term in late June or early July. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 3:54 pm
See also Alicea v. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 3:29 pm
United States and Black v. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
” In 1900 this "rule of one" as then set out in then Civil Service Law §14 was struck down by the Court of Appeals as unconstitutional.In People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision is final ... then… [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
” In 1900 this "rule of one" as then set out in then Civil Service Law §14 was struck down by the Court of Appeals as unconstitutional.In People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision is final ... then… [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 5:48 am
Justice V. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 9:59 pm
HHS and Gill v. [read post]
9 Jan 2008, 11:20 pm
Supreme Court in Crawford v. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 7:43 am
Wong and United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 8:00 am
Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 9:36 am
Carter v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 4:16 am
The National Labor Relations Board filed a Motion to Amend or Alter Judgment yesterday in Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America v NLRB, Civil Action No. 11-2262, where District of Columbia District Court Judge James Boasberg struck down the NLRB's "quickie election" rules because the NLRB lacked a quorum when it passed the new rules. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 9:00 pm
In Florence v. [read post]
