Search for: "State v. Force" Results 9381 - 9400 of 32,555
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2018, 5:56 pm by RHP
Dogs were first used by the police in the early 1900s, and by the 1950s the modern era of police dog use was underway in the United States (Dorriety, Police Service Dogs in the Use-of-Force Continuum (2005) 16 Criminal Justice Policy Review 88). [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 5:56 pm by RHP
Dogs were first used by the police in the early 1900s, and by the 1950s the modern era of police dog use was underway in the United States (Dorriety, Police Service Dogs in the Use-of-Force Continuum (2005) 16 Criminal Justice Policy Review 88). [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 5:56 pm by RHP
Dogs were first used by the police in the early 1900s, and by the 1950s the modern era of police dog use was underway in the United States (Dorriety, Police Service Dogs in the Use-of-Force Continuum (2005) 16 Criminal Justice Policy Review 88). [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 8:14 am by Florian Mueller
(United States International Trade Commission) in September and in Munich (Munich I Regional Court) in October. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 9:30 pm by Charles Tyler
Supreme Court’s decision in SEC v. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 4:19 pm by Ilya Somin
The expert near-consensus on this subject is backed by longstanding Supreme Court precedent, going back to United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 9:58 am by Kevin Kaufman
The Task Force has already seen results, facilitating voluntary local reforms, and it takes on even greater importance in the wake of the Wayfair v. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 9:14 am by David Pozen
Because of the state action doctrine, they are generally assumed to be unconstrained by the First Amendment. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 8:00 am by Guest Blogger
Magliocca makes a good case for why such appeals to fixity were likely unavoidable in the United States. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 3:50 am by Edith Roberts
First up is Washington State Department of Licensing v. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 8:15 am
The landmark Supreme Court case vindicating the rights of another American citizen, Hamdi v. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 5:36 am by INFORRM
The Judge at first instance simply stated that the allegations against Sir Philip were “reasonably credible” (a view which the Court of Appeal accepted had force), but this is plainly not the same as determining their veracity. [read post]