Search for: "State v. Minor" Results 9381 - 9400 of 16,410
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Nov 2010, 3:25 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
"   In Schnieder we see:  "Strict privity, as applied in the context of estate planning malpractice actions, is a minority rule in the United States[1]. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 3:12 pm by Will Aitchison
In the Fourth Circuit case of Minor v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 11:15 am
Carey, No. 08-60961 Defendant's aggravated sexual abuse of a minor conviction and sentence are affirmed where: 1) the admissibility of testimony accompanied by a Fed. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 4:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
Further, contrary to the petitioners' contention, the law does not limit the application of a lack of marketability discount to the goodwill of a corporation in all instances (see Matter of Brooklyn Home Dialysis Training Ctr., 293 AD2d 747; Hall v King, 265 AD2d 244, 245; Lehman v Piontkowski, 203 AD2d 257, 259; Matter of Raskin v Walter Karl, Inc., 129 AD2d 642, 644; Matter of Joy Wholesale Sundries, 125 AD2d 310; Matter of Fleischer, 107 AD2d 97; Matter of Blake… [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 10:27 am by PaulKostro
While the Supreme Court has held that a parent may “bind a minor child to arbitrate future tort claims,” Hojnowski v. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 7:37 pm
Minority Queen Newman sang her usual sharp tones of dissent, finding barbs for both her brethren and downstream district court. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 6:11 am
Human Rights Watch’s report is here.In the heart-wrenching case of K.N.L.H. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 2:32 pm by John Elwood
United States overruled United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2007, 7:18 pm by Steve
Suppose further that a minority of the Congressional representatives of the red states also supported the petitions. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 5:00 am by Eric Segall
 The major doctrinal shift that would definitely change much of constitutional law is that the authors argue that the Court's holdings in The Civil Rights Cases and United States v. [read post]