Search for: "DOE DEFENDANT"
Results 9401 - 9420
of 112,778
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2017, 7:21 am
DUI does not just refer to drunk driving. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 6:02 am
Defendant, therefore, falls under the 15 U.S.C. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 5:50 am
How does or should this change the way defense counsel practice, at least in the 9th Circuit? [read post]
10 May 2017, 7:59 am
Yet it does not mitigate the strict liability standard for people caught driving with any amount of marijuana or other illegal drug in their blood or urine. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 8:30 am
We granted the defendant's petition for certification to appeal, limited to two issues. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 10:45 am
With respect to the predisposition element of the entrapment defense, the court instructed the jury that "the amount of drugs or the profit that would be derived from their sale does not constitute an inducement supporting entrapment." [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 11:41 am
But Sizemore rejects this rationale, suggesting that a private settlement "does not preclude a district court from imposing a restitution order for the same underlying wrong. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 12:01 pm
The questions focused on the issues of (1) who has to prove knowledge under section 893.13; (2) does the statute require the State to prove that the defendant had knowledge of the illicit nature of the substance; (3) does the availability of an affirmative defense cure any constitutional deficiencies of section 893.13; and, (4) what other statutes, either in Florida, or in other states, lack the element of knowledge? [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 11:13 am
If, however, he does not have personal knowledge of the facts or control of the documents then the motion is denied and defendant is required to serve a declaration under oath that counsel does not have that personal knowledge and identify the people that do. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 8:05 am
Doe v. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 8:17 pm
The Public Defender's Office argued in Preston v. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 11:17 am
Declining to take a position on the split, the opinion found that the rule does not apply to class actions, including cases brought by a single plaintiff against multiple defendants. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 6:42 am
The company filed a lawsuit against ten Doe defendants, including our client, claiming they breached their severance contracts and seeking to identify them. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 5:01 am
Defendant moved to dismiss Plaintiff's claims. [read post]
5 May 2021, 2:13 pm
While a defendant's decision to waive his or her speedy trial right to wait for an in-person hearing does minimize the public health risk presented by the COVID-19 pandemic, delaying the defendant's motion to suppress for what may be an indefinite period of time does not come without a cost. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 6:19 am
The detective and prosecutor know, but the defendant does not, that he will immediately secure counsel to provide independent advice as to whether and when he should provide information to the detective or the prosecutors. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 2:20 pm
The post Seventh Circuit Reverses $400,000 Sanction Against Qui Tam Attorney For Recruiting Relators, And Holds That Case Not Barred By Prior Qui Tam Lawsuit Against Same Defendant appeared first on Tycko & Zavareei LLP. [read post]
Does the ADA force employers to allow employees with medical restrictions to overrule their doctors?
14 Nov 2022, 4:45 am
He argues that the [defendant] simply misunderstands the word “avoid. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 8:53 am
But if even half of the remaining claims can be proven and the company does not take the clear opportunity it has for a favorable settlement, the $650 million spent to date defending Seroquel lawsuits is going to seem like a modest down payment and the verdicts against Seroquel are going to start piling up. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 2:24 pm
The Maryland federal district court recently held that obtaining cell site location data does not implicate the Fourth Amendment, and even if it did, obtaining such information without a warrant does not require suppression. [read post]
