Search for: "House v. House" Results 9401 - 9420 of 41,246
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2014, 5:31 pm by Guest Blogger
As I also indicated in the housing discussion, I don’t think TCRR adequately explains the willingness of the Supreme Court to decide Jones v. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:31 pm by Guest Blogger
As I also indicated in the housing discussion, I don’t think TCRR adequately explains the willingness of the Supreme Court to decide Jones v. [read post]
  The Appellants assert that the House of Lords decision in Stone and Rolls Ltd v Moore Stephens [1] (in which the liquidators of Stone and Rolls were unable to pursue a claim against the company’s auditors for failure to detect a fraud perpetrated by Stone and Rolls’ sole director and shareholder) applies to the facts in this case thereby preventing Bilta (itself now in liquidation) from making any claim. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:14 am by Hugh Tomlinson QC, Matrix Law
   This is only the second time that the highest court has considered the application of the “responsible publication in the public interest”, first established by the House of Lords in Reynolds v Times Newspapers ([2001] 2 AC 127) nearly 12 years ago. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:14 am by Hugh Tomlinson QC, Matrix Law
It has been forcefully argued that the decision of the Court of Appeal is inconsistent with the decision of the House of Lords in Jameel v Wall Street Journal ([2007] 1 AC 359).  [read post]
21 May 2014, 4:35 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The search took place while the defendant was at the station house when the arresting officer went to lock up the motor vehicle. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 7:40 pm by Curtis Bradley
   It is sometimes suggested that the Supreme Court’s 1920 decision in Missouri v. [read post]