Search for: "Light v. United States" Results 9401 - 9420 of 11,342
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2019, 1:07 pm by Amy Howe
Kurtzman, 403 U.S. 602 (1971)Town of Greece v. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 10:50 am by Phil Dixon
A Durham County deputy blue-lighted the defendant after seeing him run a red light. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 2:55 pm by Eugene Volokh
Moreover, the United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement approved the procedures after it conducted an independent review of the treatment, including review from a nurse and an independent doctor. [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 7:46 am by Josh Blackman
Today the United States asks this court to reconsider and overrule its decision in Roe v. [read post]
26 Jun 2016, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
United States It has been reported that Kristina Ruehli – who has accused Bill Cosby of sexually assaulting her in 1965 – has withdrawn her defamation claim. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 9:17 am by INFORRM
Following the outcome of Schrems I, Schrems reformulated his complaint to the Irish Data Protection Commissioner (DPC) about data transfers arguing that the United States does not provide adequate protection as United States law requires Facebook Inc. to make the personal data transferred to it available to certain United States authorities, such as the National Security Agency (NSA) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and the data… [read post]
CubeSmart L.P., however, the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey found that companies could use savings clauses that “attempt…to conform to New Jersey law. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 1:01 pm by Ad Law Defense
§ 337(a) (“[A]ll such proceedings for the enforcement, or to restrain violations, of [the FDCA] shall be by and in the name of the United States”); see POM Wonderful LLC v. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 1:01 pm by Ad Law Defense
§ 337(a) (“[A]ll such proceedings for the enforcement, or to restrain violations, of [the FDCA] shall be by and in the name of the United States”); see POM Wonderful LLC v. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:43 pm by Steve Vladeck
” And, as to lifetime detention of U.S. persons, the bill by its very terms (thanks to an amendment introduced by Senator Feinstein) confirms what would have been the proper reading anyway—namely, that its detention authorization provision (section 1021) does not “affect existing law or authorities relating to the detention of United States citizens, lawful resident aliens of the United States, or any other persons who are captured or arrested… [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:19 pm by Marty Lederman
” And, as to lifetime detention of U.S. persons, the bill by its very terms (thanks to an amendment introduced by Senator Feinstein) confirms what would have been the proper reading anyway—namely, that its detention authorization provision (section 1021) does not “affect existing law or authorities relating to the detention of United States citizens, lawful resident aliens of the United States, or any other persons who are captured or arrested in… [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 10:00 pm by Michael
Indeed, the candidate's resume generally seems rather light on relevant experience. [read post]
23 May 2018, 12:59 pm by Leila Wozniak
 The notice followed the recent decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia in ACA International v. [read post]
The United State Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) released guidelines for AI patentability in February 2024. [read post]
25 May 2010, 11:26 pm by INFORRM
A public interest defence which could only be rebutted by proof of malice would not strike a fair balance (and, as the position in the United States shows, would not make reduce litigation or make it cheaper). [read post]
8 Apr 2007, 4:17 am
In light of previous events, however, I'm a tad skeptical. [read post]