Search for: "Powers v. Powers"
Results 9401 - 9420
of 55,724
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2021, 12:07 pm
Interesting developments in G 1/21! [read post]
20 May 2021, 10:46 am
Servs., Inc. v. [read post]
20 May 2021, 10:38 am
State v. [read post]
20 May 2021, 10:09 am
(For example, I argued beforehand that the court would be wrong to rule as it did in Shelby County v. [read post]
20 May 2021, 6:12 am
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
20 May 2021, 6:09 am
Fund, Inc. v. [read post]
20 May 2021, 2:30 am
Firstly, she concluded that she could not see any powerful reason to depart from the judgment of Linden J in M v Newham. [read post]
20 May 2021, 2:26 am
The Supreme Court has recently heard the appeal in FS Cairo (Nile Plaza) LLC v Brownlie: an important case concerning service out of the jurisdiction. [read post]
19 May 2021, 10:14 pm
See Okpalobi v. [read post]
19 May 2021, 2:52 pm
The No Fly List is a high-profile and powerful anti-terror tool in the government’s arsenal, but how it works is often poorly understood—in no small part because the government does not make the list nor its processes for adding, maintaining, or removing individuals publicly available, despite the list’s nonclassified status. [read post]
19 May 2021, 12:34 pm
Like any good legislation, the power or fault is in the details.Oakland’s ordinance accomplishes this by making it clear that legislative approval should not be the default. [read post]
19 May 2021, 11:50 am
The Supreme Court held Monday in BP v. [read post]
19 May 2021, 8:47 am
” In terms of the appropriations power, Congress does have ultimate authority over allocations of funds. [read post]
19 May 2021, 7:19 am
Sanford and Korematsu v. [read post]
19 May 2021, 2:19 am
Essentially, the Committee accepted that the National Assembly would: (i) Reconsider the issue of re-classifying and re-tagging the Bills as section 76 Bills (i.e. the Bills would now also be considered by the National Council of Provinces (NCOP)); (ii) Reconsider and address presidential reservations on the retrospective and arbitrary deprivations of property contained in the Bills; (iii) Invite and facilitate public participation and comments on the “fair use” provisions of the Bills;… [read post]
19 May 2021, 12:15 am
interesting that kind of «probation» in which the regulatory power moves [read post]
18 May 2021, 9:30 pm
Maggie Blackhawk (University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School) has posted "On Power & the Law: McGirt v. [read post]
18 May 2021, 9:01 pm
In Jones v. [read post]
18 May 2021, 4:08 pm
Puttaswamy v. [read post]
18 May 2021, 2:22 pm
Justice Gorsuch wrote the majority opinion in BP p.l.c. v. [read post]
