Search for: "Sell v. Sell"
Results 9401 - 9420
of 23,642
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Nov 2015, 3:08 pm
Prior to July of 2003, V&V Enterprises, Inc., did business as Mauro Brand Products and been marketing and selling “pocket sandwiches” since coming under inspection by the USDA in 1991. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 3:08 pm
” Dan-Foam A/S v. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 12:42 pm
Balsam Brands Inc. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 11:47 am
Stone Creek Inc. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2015, 9:31 pm
There is nothing in the language of the Sterling National Bank v. [read post]
15 Nov 2015, 4:41 pm
Siarkowski v. [read post]
14 Nov 2015, 7:42 am
Consider selling online. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 2:40 pm
That is one lesson from Kanfer v. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 11:13 am
”Burke v. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 2:00 am
Citing Sir Colin Rimer’s references to TUPE and “selling the business as a going concern”, the CMA argued that the importation of such notions in the analysis was not something that Parliament required of the CMA. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 3:36 pm
Look at Apple, Apple has a huge market share in the United States where are they going to grow, they want to grow by capturing the middle class that’s coming out in China right now and selling them iPhones. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 11:34 am
In Cubist v. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 4:53 am
The company began selling insurance in September 2006. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 2:24 am
Background facts Cavendish Square Holding BV v Makdessi Mr Makdessi contracted to sell to Cavendish his controlling stake in the holding company of the largest advertising and marketing communications group in the Middle East. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 10:52 pm
Copyright scholars are unusually familiar with Betamax, due to Sony Corp. of America v. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 1:06 pm
Some kinds of governmental records may properly be closed for a time–such as the details of negotiations to buy or sell real estate or terms of proposed settlement offers in litigation–but these records must eventually become public, unless a court determines that they should remain closed. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 1:06 pm
Some kinds of governmental records may properly be closed for a time–such as the details of negotiations to buy or sell real estate or terms of proposed settlement offers in litigation–but these records must eventually become public, unless a court determines that they should remain closed. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 1:06 pm
Some kinds of governmental records may properly be closed for a time–such as the details of negotiations to buy or sell real estate or terms of proposed settlement offers in litigation–but these records must eventually become public, unless a court determines that they should remain closed. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 8:00 am
In Tobinick v. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 1:30 am
What the question therefore requires is that the proprietor of the mark has to prove that the relevant class of people perceive their mark, in this case "Kit Kat", to only originate from them and not other proprietors selling similar goods, even if the goods contain other registered trademarks (or a design, in this case). [read post]
