Search for: "High v State"
Results 9421 - 9440
of 35,522
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2016, 7:44 am
7 May 2020, 7:16 am
25 Apr 2011, 1:23 pm
A truck plant in Louisville has temporarily shut down due, in part, to high fuel costs. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 6:19 am
In talc exposure litigation of ovarian cancer claims, plaintiffs were struggling to show that cosmetic talc use caused ovarian cancer, despite missteps by the defense.[1] And then lawsuit industrialist Mark Lanier entered the fray and offered a meretriciously beguiling move: Stop trying talc cases and start trying asbestos cases. [read post]
Case Comment: R (ZH and CN) v London Borough of Newham and London Borough of Lewisham [2014] UKSC 62
14 May 2015, 1:59 am
The High Court refused permission to bring the judicial review claim, but permission was granted by the Court of Appeal, which directed that the application should be retained by that court. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:26 am
It is said that it should have applied the approach in Galloway v Telegraph ([2006] EWCA Civ 17) and should only have overturned the judge’s decision on balancing conflicting Convention rights if it was “plainly wrong”. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 2:40 am
Fargo disclosed the use of a low frequency (LF) RFID tag, but stated this was only an example and noted that a more powerful (high frequency (HF)) tag could be used. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 3:24 pm
Beedles v Guiness Northern Counties Limited (2010) High Court (Manchester) (QB) HQ10X02893 [Not on Bailii yet]. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 3:24 pm
Beedles v Guiness Northern Counties Limited (2010) High Court (Manchester) (QB) HQ10X02893 [Not on Bailii yet]. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 10:30 am
Earlier coverage is in the post, "Cullen v. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 11:42 am
See Coba v. [read post]
18 Jun 2008, 9:12 am
"Let the stupidity begin...The Separate But Equal Act was set forth in Marbury v. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 7:00 am
The money laundering statute states that a crime is committed if the "proceeds" of criminal activity are hidden, but Justice Antonin Scalia, writing for the majority, stated the language should be interpreted to mean profits, not gross receipts. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:00 pm
The majority opinion’s rationale in In the Matter of Nonhuman Rights Project, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 12:26 am
In the first article in this series I looked at the US approach to the role of the inventor in patent law and practice, and at the recent decision of Judge Leonie M Brinkema in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (‘EDVA’) upholding the USPTO’s decision to refuse two patent applications on the basis that the ‘AI’ machine DABUS is not a human being and therefore cannot be an inventor under US law (Stephen Thaler v Andrew… [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 12:26 am
In the first article in this series I looked at the US approach to the role of the inventor in patent law and practice, and at the recent decision of Judge Leonie M Brinkema in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (‘EDVA’) upholding the USPTO’s decision to refuse two patent applications on the basis that the ‘AI’ machine DABUS is not a human being and therefore cannot be an inventor under US law (Stephen Thaler v Andrew… [read post]
4 Oct 2015, 7:34 am
The pleading standard in Federal Court is high. [read post]
17 Sep 2008, 5:26 pm
In fact in United States v. [read post]
31 May 2023, 3:13 am
The Supreme Court decided the case of New York State Pistol and Rifle Association v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 2:37 pm
McIntyre Machinery v. [read post]
