Search for: "State v. Light" Results 9421 - 9440 of 28,240
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2017, 3:36 pm by Theodore R. Flo
But a few of those arguments bear repeating in light of the Navient court’s ruling. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 1:27 pm by Sean Toomey
Earlier this year there was hope in the food and drug industries that the Supreme Court would revisit and possibly revise the Responsible Corporate Officer Doctrine, also known as the Park Doctrine, by granting certiorari to the Eighth Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 1:27 pm by Sean Toomey
Earlier this year there was hope in the food and drug industries that the Supreme Court would revisit and possibly revise the Responsible Corporate Officer Doctrine, also known as the Park Doctrine, by granting certiorari to the Eighth Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 1:27 pm by Sean Toomey
Earlier this year there was hope in the food and drug industries that the Supreme Court would revisit and possibly revise the Responsible Corporate Officer Doctrine, also known as the Park Doctrine, by granting certiorari to the Eighth Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 12:07 am by Jani Ihalainen
The UK Court of Appeal took this matter on earlier this summer, giving trademark holders something to chew on.The case of Glaxo Wellcome UK Ltd (t/a Allen & Hanburys) v Sandoz Ltd concerned a trademark registration for an asthma inhaler, and more specifically, its color scheme. [read post]
7 Aug 2017, 7:42 am
’ The second search, done on June 5, 2012, searched for `polygraph legal in which states. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 5:37 pm
  Consider the role of fiduciary duty and monitoring and due diligence obligations of enterprises in light of changing jurisprudence. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 10:40 pm by KLIBlogsAdmin
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd, United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit, No. 2016-2215, 25 July 2017 appeared first on Kluwer Patent Blog. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Plaintiff's "deposition testimony" stated that he was at all times "ready, willing and able" to assist the District and the new Superintendent but was never called upon to do so;2. [read post]