Search for: "State v. Word" Results 9421 - 9440 of 40,669
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2018, 6:55 am by Public Employment Law Press
Summarily terminating a federal officer holding a term appointment from his or her positionPHH Corporation v Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, USCA District of Columbia Circuit, Docket #15-1177NYPPL earlier summarized the decision in PHH Corporation v Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, a decision in which the United States Circuit Court of Appeals,  District of Columbia Circuit [Docket #15-1177] considered the issue of summarily removing a public officer… [read post]
8 Apr 2023, 6:51 pm by Howard Friedman
  Vice President Kamala Harris also issued a statement (full text) criticizing the decision.Meanwhile, in State of Washington v. [read post]
24 May 2015, 8:03 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
In a rather scathing decision in Hurst v. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 3:14 pm
Contrary to what Blackrock stated, the Court did not find any multiple meanings of the slogan, nor did Blackrock provide any. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 3:41 pm by David Smith
Received The argument revolves around the wording of s213(4) of Housing Act 2004 which states that a tenancy deposit taken in relation to an AST must be dealt with in accordance with the legislation "as from the time it is received". [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 3:41 pm by David Smith
Received The argument revolves around the wording of s213(4) of Housing Act 2004 which states that a tenancy deposit taken in relation to an AST must be dealt with in accordance with the legislation "as from the time it is received". [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 6:48 am
That order was narrowed two weeks later, to be limited to “anything aimed at inciting others to harass, stalk, cyberstalk, or threaten [Quinn],” as well as “[v]iolations of [Rev. [read post]
15 Aug 2006, 9:20 pm
  He cited them for stray words and phrases found embedded in their text - for things they said but didn't mean in the way Black pretended to understand them.One, Aetna Insurance Co. v. [read post]
25 Sep 2024, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
All of which leads us to Presidential Immunity.In the 1974 decision United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 1:22 pm by Lyrissa Lidsky
Roberts stated at one point: "People who want to watch broadcast where these words or expose their children to broadcasts where these words are used, where there is nudity, there are 800 channels where they can go for that. [read post]