Search for: "Federal Insurance Company " Results 9441 - 9460 of 21,796
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jan 2016, 1:03 pm by Gregory Dell
The California federal court had no patience with Liberty stating, “ERISA cases are irrelevant to California insurance law. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 1:03 pm by Gregorgy Dell
The California federal court had no patience with Liberty stating, “ERISA cases are irrelevant to California insurance law. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 12:59 pm by Howard S. Altarescu
  Membership is governed by the Federal Home Loan Bank Act (the “Act”), which states that insurance companies, among others, are eligible for membership. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 8:07 am
As we've previously noted, United Healthcare is the 800# gorilla in the Federal Marketplace ("Exchange") room. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 5:09 am by Mark S. Humphreys
Weatherford lawyers who sue insurance companies need to know how to stay out of Federal Court if they want to properly represent their clients. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 4:11 pm by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
Don’t rely on a phone call from the company that accounts are revised. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Pratt served as counsel to former New York State Assemblyman Pete Grannis and the Assembly Insurance Committee. [read post]
17 Jan 2016, 4:57 pm by Kevin LaCroix
In connection with the 2011 settlement, the company pled guilty to a misdemeanor criminal violation of a federal drug law. [read post]
17 Jan 2016, 9:17 am by Kevin
LEGAL DISCIPLINESPrivacyFederal drone regulations raise questions about property, privacy rights (GazetteNet)The big data of bad driving, and how insurers plan to track your every turn  (The Washington Post)Uber fined peanuts in God View surveillance, data breach investigation  (ZD Net)Data QualityRegulator Warns Tech Companies of Big Data Bias (The Wall Street Journal)  How much development data is enough? [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 5:52 pm by Christine Scheuneman
The GTOs are directed exclusively at U.S. title insurance companies and their subsidiaries and agents, requiring them, for a temporary period, to identify the individuals behind any entity that is used to purchase high-end residential real estate in Manhattan and Miami-Dade County, Florida, on an “all cash” basis. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 1:46 pm by Lyle Denniston
  Both he and his wife were convicted of corruption charges based on prosecutors’ claims that the governor used the powers of his office to help a Richmond businessman approach state agencies for help in promoting a health supplement his company was producing. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 10:20 am by Jonathan M. Gitlin
Instead, all the other stuff—regulations, laws, insurance questions, and society's comfort level—appear ready to own the issue of timing. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 8:25 am by Associates and Bruce L. Scheiner
In many cases, insureds are forced into protracted battles over PIP benefits they are owed, fighting with their own insurance companies to recover benefits. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 7:15 am by Alan L. Friel
Key take-aways include: Beware Application of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”): FCRA applies to companies that prepare and sell reports on consumers to be used for credit, employment, insurance, housing, and similar eligibility determinations, and companies that obtain and use such reports. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 2:58 pm by Jeffrey Neuburger
Fair Credit Reporting Act As the report notes, the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) applies to companies, known as consumer reporting agencies or CRAs, that compile and sell consumer reports containing consumer information that is used or expected to be used for decisions about consumer eligibility for credit, employment, insurance, housing, or other covered transactions. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 12:31 pm by Paul T. Moura
On January 12, 2016, a federal court in Utah refused to dismiss a bad faith claim brought by Federal Recovery Services against Travelers Property Casualty Company of America, despite finding that there was no duty to defend FRS under Travelers’ “CyberFirst Policy. [read post]