Search for: "In Interest of C." Results 9461 - 9480 of 42,091
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jan 2020, 11:56 am by Jonathan Shaub
The article then goes on to list three actions as the basis for that charge: (a) directing the White House to defy a subpoena for documents; (b) directing executive branch agencies and offices to defy subpoenas for documents; and (c) directing current and former executive branch officials “not to cooperate with the Committees” and to defy subpoenas for testimony. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 2:57 am by Diane Tweedlie
(c) The present board is aware that the EBA made the above findings only in the context of the correction of an error in the appellant's name and of [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 2:53 pm by Lloyd J. Jassin
               Here’s a run-down of a few techniques that can minimize the chance of getting sued for libel in fiction: (a) use disclaimers (more about that later); (b) disassociate the doppelgänger from their real-life counterpart by writing composite characters; (c) depict but do not disparage; and (d) wait for the real-life person to die before publishing your fiction. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 2:53 pm by Lloyd J. Jassin
               Here’s a run-down of a few techniques that can minimize the chance of getting sued for libel in fiction: (a) use disclaimers (more about that later); (b) disassociate the doppelgänger from their real-life counterpart by writing composite characters; (c) depict but do not disparage; and (d) wait for the real-life person to die before publishing your fiction. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 2:53 pm by Copylaw
               Here’s a run-down of a few techniques that can minimize the chance of getting sued for libel in fiction: (a) use disclaimers (more about that later); (b) disassociate the doppelgänger from their real-life counterpart by writing composite characters; (c) depict but do not disparage; and (d) wait for the real-life person to die before publishing your fiction. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 9:27 am by George Ticoras, Esq.
Evans resigned on January 7 to avoid a council vote on his removal based on alleged conflicts of interests. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 9:00 am by Howard Bashman
Among the notable reaction that post has generated, at “Dorf on Law,” Michael C. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 8:52 am by admin
  Schmieding seeks damages from Lurie, plus pre-judgment interest, costs and attorneys’ fees, and the imposition of personal liability for same upon each of the four named individual defendants. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 7:53 am by Shannon O'Hare
Withholding tax on interest is charged at up to 20 per cent but may be reduced subject to reliance on applicable double taxation treaties. [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 9:29 am by Phil Dixon
This post summarizes published criminal opinions from the North Carolina Court of Appeals decided yesterday, Jan. 7, 2020. [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 12:55 am by Levin & Perconti Team
Therefore, it is always in the family’s best interest to discuss concerns and have legal questions answered by an attorney as soon after their child’s injury occurred. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 9:16 pm by Scott McKeown
In 2019, there were a number developments of interest to litigators, from tricks to avoid the PTAB altogether, to new risks on fee awards and estoppel. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
”That is indeed an interesting story, and Roberts draws from it the lesson that there is “no place for mob violence” in our constitutional order. [read post]
The court found that the extensive findings by the City Council show that it considered the General Plan, Community Plan, and the City’s steep hillside development regulations when approving the project, and in doing so balanced the competing interests such that they did not abuse their discretion by finding the project exempt from CEQA. [read post]
The court found that the extensive findings by the City Council show that it considered the General Plan, Community Plan, and the City’s steep hillside development regulations when approving the project, and in doing so balanced the competing interests such that they did not abuse their discretion by finding the project exempt from CEQA. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 11:43 am by DLA Piper
” The proposed changes would allow additional persons and entities to qualify as “accredited investors,” thereby allowing them to purchase securities through private offerings, including shares and interests in certain private investments funds. [read post]