Search for: "Matter of Mark T."
Results 9461 - 9480
of 16,587
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2013, 2:07 am
But after a while, I realized that it didn’t matter, that I should just follow the streets where they led and enjoy the scene as I passed through. [read post]
16 May 2013, 1:48 pm
Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., Mark Kirk, R-Ill., Maria Cantwell, D-Wash., and David Vitter, R-La. [read post]
15 May 2013, 8:57 am
This is an important reminder, but it leads Morozov to be highly critical of activist discourses around things like SOPA/PIPA/ACTA’s “don’t break the internet” advocacy, and here (like many of his reviewers) I think he somewhat misses the mark. [read post]
15 May 2013, 6:55 am
The great disparity in overnights here—56% to 44%—stood in marked contrast to the cases cited by the mother where the parents had equal, or essentially equal, custodial time. [read post]
14 May 2013, 12:16 pm
Mark Warner (1%). [read post]
14 May 2013, 11:47 am
Cir. 2005)(quotation marks omitted); Sulzer Textil A.G. v. [read post]
13 May 2013, 8:08 pm
They do not, at first blush, simplify matters. [read post]
13 May 2013, 7:30 am
(brackets and internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
13 May 2013, 7:16 am
But right now we really don’t have enough information. [read post]
13 May 2013, 5:43 am
Defendants argued that “General Steel” wasn’t a valid mark. [read post]
13 May 2013, 4:00 am
I don’t like the word “brand” to describe lawyers. [read post]
9 May 2013, 3:23 pm
The order of the words matters in Google’s search algorithm. [read post]
9 May 2013, 10:12 am
And this from a man who not too long ago used to put the phrase “Commander-in-Chief” between quotation marks. [read post]
9 May 2013, 9:22 am
No matter how many times these allegations are repeated, all available evidence shows concerns over research and innovation to be unfounded. [read post]
8 May 2013, 11:22 am
The resolution of the flap over campaign ads paid for by a group (Fwd.us) funded by some leading tech barons, most notably Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg, is going to be revealing of many things. [read post]
7 May 2013, 11:28 am
Two years ago, Dallas Cowboys receiver Roy Williams sued his ex-fiancée over a $77,000 engagement ring but got the ring back without going to court.Several State Supreme Court and Appellate Division rulings in engagement ring cases over the last decade have, in effect, established New York as a “no-fault engagement” state, meaning that it doesn’t matter why an engagement gets called off or whether one party or the other did something wrong. [read post]
4 May 2013, 7:40 am
Other point: Paper makes a TM comparison, where courts often balance the social value of the use of the mark with the likelihood of confusion on an ad hoc basis. [read post]
3 May 2013, 1:31 pm
I can’t count the number of times non-lawyers as well as well-informed law professors have asked me, for example, “Whatever happened to declarations of war? [read post]
3 May 2013, 4:48 am
But that only matters when the difference in burden affects who should win, and the TTAB’s decision here showed that the burden wasn’t material, saying, “[t]o the extent that any doubts might exist as to the correctness of our likelihood of confusion analysis, especially considering the prior determination that opposer's mark is merely descriptive and has not acquired secondary meaning, we resolve such doubts against applicant. [read post]
2 May 2013, 12:53 pm
Tsarnaev a text message: one photograph, he wrote, bore a marked resemblance to him. [read post]
