Search for: "Cross v. State"
Results 9481 - 9500
of 16,713
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Aug 2013, 12:13 pm
Cross-posted at The Persistent Objector. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 9:22 pm
It states that, “a person riding a bicycle … has all the rights … and is subject to all the provisions applicable to the driver of a vehicle. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 3:11 pm
” Jones v. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 1:57 pm
Supp. 2d 420, 468 (E.D.N.Y. 2011) (no expertise); Cross v. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 8:41 am
Recently, the Federal Circuit issued a decision in Rembrandt Vision Technologies v. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 9:54 am
Affirming a state district court, the Nebraska Supreme Court ruled that an African-American state employee failed to present sufficient evidence that health plans offered in certain ZIP codes were inferior and that those inferiorities resulted in an adverse impact (Cartwright v State of Nebraska, August 9, 2013, McCormack, M). [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 9:30 am
Cross-posted on the Law Theories blog. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 1:29 pm
In the case of Gioia v. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 6:31 am
United States. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 6:18 am
Seltzer v. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 5:09 am
In the United States, cross-examination is considered an important way to test the truth of a statement. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 1:11 am
Urban Outfitters takes these matters very seriously, therefore, we have taken action to have the Koto Cross-Stitch Denim Button-Down shirt removed immediately from our stores and our website. [read post]
11 Aug 2013, 9:01 pm
Steinman noted in his July 1, 2013 decision in N.S. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2013, 11:11 am
(Cross-posted from Diane Marie Amann; photo credits here and here) Filed under: You go 'Grrl Tagged: International criminal law [read post]
11 Aug 2013, 5:55 am
HOLMES DISSENTIn Abrams v. [read post]
10 Aug 2013, 6:07 am
In Acosta v Acosta--- F.3d ----, 2013 WL 3970239 (C.A.8 (Minn.)) [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 12:09 pm
See Singh v. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 9:34 pm
The revelation on Thursday contrasts oddly with the announcement Google made on the same day concerning a patent pledge.The new German filing is not an infringement action over new patents but represents a major escalation of four previous Motorola v. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 9:06 am
In the Microsoft v. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 6:22 am
The case, Dixon v. [read post]
