Search for: "LARGE v. LARGE" Results 9481 - 9500 of 40,644
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Dec 2019, 6:00 am by Kevin Kaufman
This would impact not only the large number of small business owners operating over 10,000 vape shops around the country, but also convenience stores and gas stations relying heavily on vapers as well as tobacco sales. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 9:05 pm by Colleen V. Chien
For example, in Engquist v. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 10:00 am by Rick St. Hilaire
Attorney Geoffrey Berman's office last week confirms that Latchford "remains at large, residing in Thailand. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 1:30 am
Both images are characterised by a large head, one open white eye and a slightly open mouth, both placed in the lower left part of the head, and a tail with a Y-shaped end facing upwards. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 9:55 am by Gene Takagi
Borello & Sons, Inc. v Dept. of Industrial Relations (1989) 48 Cal.3d 341. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 2:23 am
Jane Lambert Patents Court (Mr Justice Birss) Conversant Wireless Licensing SARL v Apple Retail UK Ltd and others  [2019] EWHC 3266 (Pat) (29 Nov 2019) This was a claim for the infringement of British patent GB2365712, The claimant, Conversant Wireless Licensing Sarl, has acquired a large patent portfolio in mobile telecommunications and related technologies (including the [read post]
1 Dec 2019, 7:32 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The remainder is largely from tuition. [read post]
1 Dec 2019, 7:09 am by Florian Mueller
Qualcomm rulingFormer Secretary of Homeland Security, former FTC chairman, and conservative think tank dismiss Qualcomm's and DOJ's "national security" argumentsFormer Secretary of Homeland Security, former FTC chairman, and conservative think tank dismiss Qualcomm's and DOJ's "national security" argumentsFour IT industry bodies support FTC against Qualcomm's appeal: once again, The Industry v. [read post]
30 Nov 2019, 11:19 am by Florian Mueller
While it's very important that the industry at large makes this effort, there's nothing surprising in there, apart from a reference in ACT | The App Association's brief--which also talks about the need for thousands of small IoT innovators to have access to SEPs on FRAND terms--to a case in which SEP-related issues allegedly prevented innovative products from being created:"The Association has direct experience with the deleterious effect of SEP abuses. [read post]