Search for: "No Named Defendant" Results 9481 - 9500 of 57,361
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2010, 5:21 pm by Matt Brown
Rule 11 of our rules of criminal procedure covers competency to stand trial, so lawyers usually refer to competency proceedings using the name of the rule. [read post]
28 Feb 2010, 8:15 pm
             The claims of the named plaintiffs are typical of the absent class members claims;   B. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 9:14 am by Gene Killian
 The New Jersey Supremes, for example,  dealt with a question often posed by our clients in construction defect cases: Namely, can a claimant proceed directly against a defendant’s insurance company? [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Contending that three of the statements made by the County Executive were defamatory, Plaintiff sued Monroe County, among other named defendants [herein after collectively "Defendants"]. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Contending that three of the statements made by the County Executive were defamatory, Plaintiff sued Monroe County, among other named defendants [herein after collectively "Defendants"]. [read post]
At the class certification stage, the sole-remaining named Plaintiff represented that her “expert [could] use econometric tools to isolate the value of 4G/LTE. [read post]
20 May 2024, 1:23 pm by Bill Budington
To be clear, prosecutors have apparently not sought to use court orders to compel either the defendants or the companies named to enter passwords or otherwise open devices or apps. [read post]
21 May 2013, 10:24 am by Michelle Yeary
  Plaintiff argued that the essence of [her] claim is not that the defendant breached a duty to the FDA, but that it breached a duty to [the Decedent], who was in the foreseeable zone of risk created by [Defendant] – namely the duty to provide an adequate warning of the dangers of its product, which in this case paralleled its duty to comply with the conditions of its PMA. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Essentially Plaintiff alleged that Defendant had unlawfully discrimination against him on the basis of his race, ethnicity, or national origin in violation of Title VII. [read post]
20 May 2013, 4:49 am
The first letter demanded access to the corporation's financial records and requested the name of the corporation's accounting firm, and the second letter accused defendants of ignoring the first letter and gave the defendants notice that Williams was requesting financial records pursuant to Virginia Code § 13.1-774. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Essentially Plaintiff alleged that Defendant had unlawfully discrimination against him on the basis of his race, ethnicity, or national origin in violation of Title VII. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 12:15 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Defendants argued that this was puffery and not alleged to be deceptive or harmful. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 9:00 pm
You’re sitting in the courtroom and your docket number and name is called. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 12:17 pm by Mack Sperling
Miller opened a new restaurant under the name Village Inn Lakeside which used Village Inn's licensed marks and pizza boxes and cups identical to those used in Plaintiff's restaurants. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 5:00 am
  Plaintiff first used a report by an expert named “Lobel,” which the court described as “sufficient” for that purpose. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 8:49 am by Rebecca Tushnet
The individual named defendants allegedly “directed, participated in, sanctioned, ratified, or acquiesced” in the decision to sue Dawgs and to continue the 2006 lawsuit through the present. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 9:53 pm by H. Scott Leviant
  Instead, according to Plaintiff, Defendants included new matter for the first time in their reply papers—namely, argument directed to specific Schellenberg RFAs that Defendants claimed were deficient—and that the court granted the Motion based upon the presentation of such new arguments. [read post]
14 Mar 2021, 4:19 pm by Dennis Crouch
  For an out-of-state-defendant (such as TracFone), venue in W.D. [read post]