Search for: "Read v. People"
Results 9481 - 9500
of 21,735
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2015, 8:19 am
One unfamiliar with open source would read the court’s opinion as an indictment against open source software’s fundamental reliability: Open source code is problematic because anonymous people on the internet design it, and “holes” are not fixed by vendor updates. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 12:40 pm
Ala.) in Spears v. [read post]
12 Nov 2012, 2:00 am
” Professor Ann Conaway, in her withering critique of Chancellor Strine’s decision (read here), presents the argument against reading into Section 18-1104 the incorporation of traditional fiduciary duties. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 8:28 am
Who knows what people are thinking? [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 7:55 am
This article is the first entry in a symposium previewing Trump v. [read post]
20 Jul 2019, 3:27 am
Can we put aside partisan differences to do what is best for the people we serve? [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 4:37 pm
" Straka v. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm
Justice Scalia responded that this reading “is quite absurd and the Court’s 21 pages of explanation make it no less so”. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 6:51 pm
In New York v. [read post]
19 May 2014, 1:40 pm
Since the established practice was followed, there was no question of any illegality or unconstitutionality.The decision in AK Subbaiah v Karnataka Legislature Secretariat may also be noted. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 1:43 pm
State v. [read post]
26 May 2017, 1:45 pm
When the authorities are allowed to get away with such things, the people who pay most sharply are the people who are out in the streets, trying to push their country to become a better, more just place. [read post]
12 Mar 2023, 9:54 am
District of Columbia v. [read post]
27 Dec 2024, 4:00 am
I strongly suggest you read it. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 3:19 pm
Indeed, if the California amendment is read literally, it does not forbid California officials from continuing to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples, even if the amendment is passed. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 9:35 pm
CAAF ruled 3-2 in United States v. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 2:00 am
What does that mean now, when read with Gnall? [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm
In the 2008 case of Baze v. [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 12:54 pm
(Read the original post mentioned above) [read post]
