Search for: "Strong v. State"
Results 9481 - 9500
of 14,279
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Sep 2023, 1:04 pm
In Acheson Hotels v. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm
That was and will be the broadest statute to revive SOLs in the United States, because the Supreme Court considered the law and held that criminal SOLs may not be revived, because that would violate the Ex Post Facto Clause in Stogner v. [read post]
24 May 2016, 1:49 pm
The Economic Loss Rule and the Ability to Sue Design Professionals without a Contract A recent Maryland case, Balfour Beatty Infrastructure, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 11:23 am
Had that been the case, the New York State and United States legislatures would have added language providing for such exceptions. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 4:11 pm
Data Privacy and Data Protection Harvard’s Business Review has an article on how the implementation of strong privacy policies can save companies millions in liability. [read post]
17 Oct 2007, 10:44 am
The Court on Sept. 25 agreed to rule on the case of Baze v. [read post]
11 May 2010, 4:26 pm
In Tamburo v. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 4:28 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 6:36 pm
(IIT v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 1:02 am
The legislation’s stated aim is to regulate digital media platforms, such as social media sites or search engines, by promoting voluntary commercial agreements between the platform and news outlets. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 1:24 pm
READ PARTS I-V (pp. 101-138 in SSRN version).We have been unpacking what might at first appear to be a rather straightforward inquiry: "what is law?" [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 7:53 am
The Ricci v. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 6:21 am
The FTC's trial brief says "MediaTek [...] began supplying CDMA modem chips for use in handsets sold in China in 2015 and for use in handsets sold in the United States in 2016. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 4:21 am
(CSI) v. [read post]
14 Mar 2009, 12:06 am
Hoffman v. [read post]
2 Aug 2019, 7:56 am
The provisions specifically praised in Wayfair have been replicated in state after state to give their laws a strong presumption of constitutionality. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 9:01 pm
Drawing on and quoting from Printz v. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 7:00 am
We foresee no obstacle to a State’s dealing effectively with this problem. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 4:57 pm
(D.I. 535)Footnote 6 is relevant to Teva v. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 7:11 am
” Thus, as the Supreme Court explained in Sosa v. [read post]
